[Reproducible-builds] Reprotest week 59 blog comments
infinity0 at debian.org
Fri Jun 17 17:13:47 UTC 2016
> For other packages, it's unclear to me whether I should specify them as depends or recommends: they aren't dependencies in a strict sense, but marking them as dependencies will make it easier to install a fully-functional reprotest.
You should specify these as Recommends, the definition matches what you just described . Also see how diffoscope does things.
 https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps starting from "The meaning of the five dependency fields is as follows:"
> When reprotest runs with variations enabled that it can't test because it doesn't have the correct packages installed, I intend to have it print a warning but continue to run.
I'd say it's better to fail fast. Warnings can easily be missed. If the user really doesn't want to test a variation, they can disable it using the mechanisms you already mentioned.
> Locales are a particular problem because I don't know of a way in Debian to specify that a given locale must be installed.
All locales are installed by default (unless you install the "localepurge" package, which is an unsupported hack that you don't need to worry about), so you just need to reconfigure the locales package to "generate" the fr locale. I'm not sure how this works exactly, but you can look into it. You can do it manually via `sudo dpkg-reconfigure locales` but you might be able to script this within reprotest.
> While at the moment, reprotest only builds on the existing system, when I start extending it to other build environments, this will require double-dispatch, because the code that needs to be executed will depend on both the variation to be tested and the environment being built on.
I don't understand this - could you elaborate a bit more, on what you mean by "double dispatch" and why we need this?
More information about the Reproducible-builds