[Reproducible-builds] Remaining reprotest variations
Vagrant Cascadian
vagrant at debian.org
Wed Jul 27 20:48:10 UTC 2016
On 2016-07-27, Ceridwen wrote:
> For most of the variations I've done so far, I've been either
> depending on external utilities or had POSIX-compliant ways to execute
> them. The rest of the variations pose more problems.
...
> 5. kernel: While `uname` is in the POSIX standard, mechanisms for
> altering its output aren't. `setarch`, what prebuilder uses and what
> reprotest uses at the moment, is Linux-specific.
> - What methods of changing `uname` will work on other OSes?
Using "setarch uname26" on non-x86 architectures may cause issues with
recent versions of glibc, too:
https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/Week-of-Mon-20151130/004040.html
https://bugs.debian.org/806911
https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-12/msg00028.html
So it certainly should be optional, at best.
live well,
vagrant
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20160727/d818e4d4/attachment.sig>
More information about the Reproducible-builds
mailing list