misleading timestamps in binnmus

Holger Levsen holger at layer-acht.org
Thu Nov 10 09:48:33 UTC 2016


On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:38:45AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > I see. And this changelog.$arch is neither part of the source package,
> > the .changes file nor the .buildinfo file, it's just included in the
> > binary packages? Or is it also part of the .changes file?
> It's in .changes as well. No idea if (any of it) is in .buildinfo
 
I certainly hope it's part of the .buildinfo file as well, else, for
reproducing binNMUs we would also need to store the .changes files in an
easily accessable manner… (which we plan to do for .buildinfo files, but
not for .changes files atm…)


-- 
cheers,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20161110/50ef0896/attachment.sig>


More information about the Reproducible-builds mailing list