Bug#847805: reprotest: document/support simple reproducibility test with sbuild
Sean Whitton
spwhitton at spwhitton.name
Mon Dec 12 15:44:54 UTC 2016
Hello Johannes, Mattia,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:05:29AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> In the latter case, I'm open to patches against sbuild which could easily carry
> such an sbuild wrapper to automatically test reproducibility with sbuild on
> Debian (and derivatives).
>
> In either case, with my sbuild maintainer hat on, please file wishlist bugs
> against sbuild if its interface is not sufficient to run reproducibility tests
> with it.
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:05:30PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Ditto for pbuilder.
Thank you for your replies. sbuild is definitely sufficient, it's just
a bit of a drag -- you have to rename the .changes to save the
checksums, and then run sbuild a second time, and compare. I was going
to write a shell script to do this, but then someone in #debian-devel
told me to look at reprotest.
--
Sean Whitton
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20161212/f4e3b893/attachment.sig>
More information about the Reproducible-builds
mailing list