Bug#817193: diffoscope: failing tests: test_gzip.py::test_metadata, test_ipk.py::test_metadata, test_java.py::test_diff

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek at in.waw.pl
Sun Feb 26 18:20:21 UTC 2017


On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 05:37:51PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:48:14PM +0800, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > tags 817193 + unreproducible
> > thanks
> > 
> > Chris Lamb wrote:
> > 
> > > Are you still any of these test failures with a recent diffoscope
> > > version? We have made a few locale changes recently so its likely
> > > that at least some of these are fixed.
> > 
> > As I can't reproduce this and there has been no reply I'm going to
> > go ahead and close it. Re-open if you can still demonstrate the issue
> > of course. :)
> 
> Hi,
> sorry for the late reply. Too many packages ;)
> 
> With diffoscope-77, I get the following failures:
> (Fedora rawhide amd64 mock, export LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 TZ=UTC)
> 
> =================================== FAILURES ===================================
> _________________________________ test_listing _________________________________
> 
> differences = [<Difference cbfstool {} print -- cbfstool {} print []>, <Difference text -- text []>]
> 
>     @skip_unless_tools_exist('cbfstool')
>     def test_listing(differences):
>         expected_diff = get_data('cbfs_listing_expected_diff')
> >       assert differences[0].unified_diff == expected_diff
> E       assert '@@ -1,3 +1,3...      31896\n' == '@@ -1,6 +1,3 ...      31896\n'
> E         - @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
> E         ?       ^
> E         + @@ -1,6 +1,3 @@
> E         ?       ^
> E         + -32 kB, bootblocksize 0, romsize 32768, offset 0x0
> E         + -alignment: 64 bytes, architecture: x86
> E         + -
> E            Name                           Offset     Type         Size
> E           -text                           0x0        raw          446
> E           -(empty)                        0x200      null         32152
> E           +text                           0x0        raw          671
> E           +(empty)                        0x300      null         31896
> 
> tests/comparators/test_cbfs.py:80: AssertionError
> ---------------------------- Captured stderr setup -----------------------------
> Created CBFS (capacity = 32664 bytes)
> Created CBFS (capacity = 32664 bytes)
> __________________________________ test_diff ___________________________________
> 
> differences = [<Difference cd-iccdump {} -- cd-iccdump {} []>]
> 
>     @skip_unless_tools_exist('cd-iccdump')
>     def test_diff(differences):
>         expected_diff = get_data('icc_expected_diff')
> >       assert differences[0].unified_diff == expected_diff
> E       assert '@@ -1,20 +1,... [24 bytes]\n' == '@@ -1,20 +1,2... [24 bytes]\n'
> E           @@ -1,20 +1,20 @@
> E            icc:
> E            Header:
> E              Size		= 14684 bytes
> E              Version		= 4.3
> E              Profile Kind	= display-device
> E              Colorspace	= rgb
> E              Conn. Space	= xyz
> E           -  Date, Time	= 2016-02-15, 21:02:09
> E           +  Date, Time	= 2016-02-15, 21:03:22
> E              Flags 		= Not embedded profile, Use anywhere
> E              Dev. Attrbts	= reflective, glossy
> E              Rndrng Intnt	= perceptual
> E              Creator		= lcms
> E           -  Profile ID	= 0x0477fa4b
> E           +  Profile ID	= 0x06017f17
> E            
> E            tag 00:
> E              sig	'desc' [0x64657363]
> E              size	38
> E              type	'mluc' [0x6d6c7563]
> E            Text:
> E         -    ne_SU:	sRGB [24 bytes]
> E         ?     -  -
> E         +    en_US:	sRGB [24 bytes]
> E         ?    +  +
> 
> tests/comparators/test_icc.py:47: AssertionError
> ============== 2 failed, 249 passed, 42 skipped in 44.78 seconds ===============
> 
> The second issue looks like a real difference.
> 
> The first issue I think is just a slightly different diff context between
> the texts. I have seen something similar when generating patches using different
> versions of git.

Actually no, the first also looks like a real difference. For some reason
the expected header is not printed:

$ "cbfstool" "/tmp/pytest-of-zbyszek/pytest-11/test_listing0/coreboot1" "print"
Name                           Offset     Type         Size
text                           0x0        raw          446
(empty)                        0x200      null         32152

$ "cbfstool" "/tmp/pytest-of-zbyszek/pytest-11/test_listing0/coreboot2.rom" "print"
Name                           Offset     Type         Size
text                           0x0        raw          671
(empty)                        0x300      null         31896

$ rpm -qf /bin/cbfstool
coreboot-utils-4.2-2.fc24.x86_64
coreboot-utils-4.5-2.fc26.x86_64 (the same)



More information about the Reproducible-builds mailing list