policy: packages should be reproducible

[Holger Levsen]

On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 06:15:38PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > unsurprisingly I'm also in favor of making this policy change, now.
> Actually, yes, why were we waiting for stretch to be released? :)

good question. I guess because of a mental barrier against doing changes
targeted post-stretch now :)
 
> > Last and least for now: the wording of
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=844431;filename=debian-policy.diff.txt;msg=17
> > IMO is almost good as it is, though I'll try to amend it to include the
> > definition of reproducible builds from reproducible-builds.org. 
> That seems the next concrete step.

indeed! Will see to work on this the next days…


-- 
cheers,
	Holger
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20170514/9db27f76/attachment.sig>