Requsting help: reproducibility regressions in pwgen and e2fsprogs?

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 11:36:55PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Yet both seem to be broken, and with pwgen, it looks like it's being
> the debugging pathname has somehow leaked into the ELF / debugging
> information:

That's actually our fault, sorry if it leaked off to you.  In unstable
we are experimenting with build path variation, and that causes
unreproducible results unless a patched gcc (coupled with a patched
dpkg) is in use.  We aren't setting any block, so every time a new gcc
is uploaded to the regular archive it overwrites our version…

I've scheduled both pwgen and e2fsprogs for rebuild now, thye should
turn sunny soon.

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20170810/67eb3951/attachment.sig>