Bug#844431: Revised patch: seeking seconds
bunk at debian.org
Wed Aug 16 16:09:08 UTC 2017
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 03:43:00PM +0000, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Adrian Bunk:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:37:00AM +0000, Ximin Luo wrote:
> >> [..]
> >> Fair enough. I actually spotted that but thought it was better to get "something" into Policy rather than nitpick. I guess other people were thinking similar things. Well, lesson learnt, I will be more forceful next time.
> >> ...
> > What is the point of getting "something" into policy, when it is known
> > to not match existing practice and that what is being added to policy
> > will be ignored by everyone?
> >> The sentence I amended said "most environment variables" so our intent is clear.
> >> ...
> > This is not about "intent", this is about giving an exact definition
> > of reproducibility for Debian.
> > The definition should then match what is recorded in .buildinfo
> > and what the reproducible builds infrastructure is testing.
> The exact wording that was added, was a too-loose requirement. I'm now proposing to make the requirement more strict, in accordance with the tests that we're running. Do you have any comments on my proposal?
Will both dpkg-genbuildinfo and the reproducible builds infrastructure
implement this definition?
Any definition is fine for me as long as it will match what is actually
 not excluding future changes, but at the time the policy will be
published it should match reality
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
More information about the Reproducible-builds