[buildd-tools-devel] Some Debian package upgrades are corrupting rsync "quick check" backups

Aurelien Jarno aurelien at aurel32.net
Mon Aug 28 10:58:48 UTC 2017


On 2017-08-28 12:42, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2017-08-28 12:33, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2017-08-28 18:06, Adam Warner wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2017-05-13 at 22:48 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > On 2017-05-13 21:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > > On 2017-05-13 17:52, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > > > > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 03:44:57PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > > > > >  a) Has anything changed in the meantime?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Yes: sbuild stopped repeating the changelog time taking it from
> > > > > > the last
> > > > > > entry, and will instead generate a new timestamp based on the
> > > > > > current
> > > > > > time:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >   * For binNMUs, instead of copying the timestamp of the last
> > > > > > changelog entry,
> > > > > >     generate a new one (closes: #843773)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > In version 0.73.0-1.
> > > > > 
> > > > > And I am glad that after all that months with people talking about
> > > > > the
> > > > > issue, I finally got a detailed description of the issue and a
> > > > > pointer
> > > > > to the commit to backport. I'll work on that.
> > > > 
> > > > The above change should now be deployed on most jessie based buildds,
> > > > it's only missing on the buildds that are currently down.
> > > 
> > > Original thread author here reporting to beware that some rsync data
> > > corruption can still become apparent after all this time.
> > > 
> > > It's been a while since I did a full rsync checksum test. Decided to do
> > > one after a recent upgrade that includes clang 3.9 related files. These
> > > are Debian systems that default to unstable BUT include all debian apt
> > > sources including experimental/unstable/testing/stable/oldstable.
> > > 
> > > I found these four corrupted files in my rsync backups:
> > > 
> > > var/lib/dpkg/info/clang-3.9.md5sums
> > > var/lib/dpkg/info/libclang-common-3.9-dev.md5sums
> > > var/lib/dpkg/info/libclang1-3.9:amd64.md5sums
> > > var/lib/dpkg/info/libllvm3.9:amd64.md5sums
> > > 
> > > The latest packages were installed from this repository:
> > > 
> > > Get:17 https://cdn-aws.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 clang-3.9 amd64 1:3.9.1-11 [37.3 MB]
> > > Get:18 https://cdn-aws.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 libclang-common-3.9-dev amd64 1:3.9.1-11 [2,587 kB]
> > > Get:19 https://cdn-aws.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 libllvm3.9 amd64 1:3.9.1-11 [11.4 MB]
> > > Get:20 https://cdn-aws.deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 libclang1-3.9 amd64 1:3.9.1-11 [5,896 kB]                                                                  
> > 
> > These files haven't been built on a build daemon, but instead have
> > been uploaded by the maintainer [1]. This is therefore not a buildd
> > issue, the issue has been fixed there already with the upgrade to
> > stretch.
> 
> More precisely the two latest changelog entries have the same date:
> 

I have just filled a bug against ftp.debian.org for such packages to be
rejected. See: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873489

Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien at aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20170828/dd4fdf12/attachment.sig>


More information about the Reproducible-builds mailing list