Question about strip-nondeterminism in bsh

jathan jathanblackred at openmailbox.org
Mon Oct 16 19:40:13 UTC 2017


On 11/10/17 21:02, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi jathan,
> 
>> I will check the GitHub code instead of Debian Sources. 
> 
> The GitHub repositories are read-only mirrors. If you are checking out
> the code as a member of the Reproducible Builds team, then it makes more
> sense to get it from Alioth, for example:
> 
>   $ git clone git.debian.org:/git/reproducible/strip-nondeterminism
> 
>>> What, exactly, makes you say that tar archives are normalised by strip-
>>> nondeterminism? 
>>
>> I was thinking tar archives are normalised by strip-nondeterminism
>> based on the next contents:
>>
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ReproducibleBuilds/strip-nondeterminism/master/bin/strip-nondeterminism
> 
> You've linked to *something* here, but I don't follow your chain of
> reasoning that leads to you believe tar archives are normalised. Can
> you help?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
I was focusing in timestamps instead of tar archives, an apology for the
misunderstanding. So checking there are not any content related to tar
archives in the source code of strip-nondeterminism, I think tar
archives format is not yet supported. I am right?

Jathan

-- 
Por favor evita enviarme adjuntos en formato de word o powerpoint, si
quieres saber porque lee esto:
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.es.html
¡Cámbiate a GNU/Linux! http://getgnulinux.org/es

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 878 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20171016/756e46fa/attachment.sig>


More information about the Reproducible-builds mailing list