Question about strip-nondeterminism in bsh

[jathan]

On 16/10/17 14:43, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Jathan,
> 
>> there are not any content related to tar archives in the source code
>> of strip-nondeterminism, I think tar archives format is not yet
>> supported.
> 
> Correct. :)
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
Thank you for teaching me to think more technically and to learn from
what has emerged in Reproducible Builds Lamby. So now I can safely say
to Emmanuel Bourg that tar timestamps are not yet normalized by
strip-nondeterminism and me keep working on the bsh corrections based on
the bug comments right? :)

-- 
Por favor evita enviarme adjuntos en formato de word o powerpoint, si
quieres saber porque lee esto:
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.es.html
¡Cámbiate a GNU/Linux! http://getgnulinux.org/es

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 878 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20171016/3730341c/attachment.sig>