Question about strip-nondeterminism in bsh

[jathan]

On 16/10/17 17:23, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Jathan,
> 
>> Thank you for teaching me to think more technically and to learn from
>> what has emerged
> 
> No problem! I thought it best to not "spoonfeed" you the answers!
> 
>> I can safely say to Emmanuel Bourg that tar timestamps are not
>> yet normalized by strip-nondeterminism
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> By the way, you say "yet" -- one idea behind strip-nondeterminism is that
> it will, one day, go away. That means we actually avoid adding features
> wherever possible, so we probably *won't* add support for tar archives. :)
> 
> 
> Best wishes,
> 
Thanks Lamby! So it would be right to write some simple answer to
Emmanuel like this at the bug?:



Hi Emmanuel,

Tar timestamps are not normalized by strip-nondeterminism. Best regards.

Jathan



Is that enough? Regards!

Jathan

-- 
Por favor evita enviarme adjuntos en formato de word o powerpoint, si
quieres saber porque lee esto:
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.es.html
¡Cámbiate a GNU/Linux! http://getgnulinux.org/es

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 878 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20171017/f246c45b/attachment.sig>