pocl has reproducible test result: FTBFS

[Mattia Rizzolo]

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 09:10:45AM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 08:46:14AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-opencl-devel%40lists.alioth.debian.org
> > 
> > lists pocl as FTBFS from reproducible test results ... which is correct
> > (it does FTBFS on armhf/arm64) but worthless information (so far it
> > never built successfully (due to testsuite failures) on !x86).
> > 
> > Where can this be fixed? No, not on the pocl side :-)
> 
> we can mark it with a special issue, which causes qa.debian.org to not
> display this ftbfs case. i'm about to enter a plane so I wont do it
> right now, but will do so later, unless someone else will do it til
> then.

However, I don't understand why, given that it seems quite clear to me
that nobody is working on a proper port, you haven't restricted the
architectures it can be built for.

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20180318/c5536d57/attachment.sig>