dpkg/gcc-8 regressions
Holger Levsen
holger at layer-acht.org
Thu Aug 9 01:57:15 BST 2018
hi,
from irc:
[14:52] < h01ger> | vgrntc: moin :)
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/stats_pkg_state.png
looks like we are regressing. havent looked closer though. also visible
on other archs, eg arm64 (amd armhf and i386 to a lesser degree)
[15:03] < vgrntc> | h01ger: to be expected
[15:03] < h01ger> | that much? uff
[15:05] < vgrntc> | h01ger: i figured maybe 2/3rd of the path issues
[15:08] < vgrntc> | h01ger: which wete maybe 10-15% total
[15:14] < h01ger> | vgrntc: when you say "maybe 2/3rd of the path
issues" you mean "maybe 2/3rd of the path issues we had fixed with our
patched gcc-7" and not "maybe 2/3rd of the path issues visible in sid
but not in buster" right? though the diff is not that big anyway
[15:15] < h01ger> | the diff between sid and buster is less than
10% (in total, not in percent), so i dont get why sid becomes so
unreproducible anyway
(times are CEST yesterday)
--
cheers,
Holger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds).org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20180809/23299276/attachment.sig>
More information about the Reproducible-builds
mailing list