testing migration aging and reproducible builds

Holger Levsen holger at layer-acht.org
Sun Jul 21 22:48:49 BST 2019

On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 05:35:53PM -0300, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 11:55:59AM -0300, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > This makes me think to decrease the delay for reproducible packages
> > rather than increase the delay for unreproducible ones? Though then
> > you'd want it to be a small increment...
> How about if the current bonus of three days is dependent on both
> autopkgtests *and* reproducibility? That keeps the incentive without ending
> up with same-day migrations.

/me likes!


       PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C

Dance like no one's watching. Encrypt like everyone is.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20190721/7ce5c5e1/attachment.sig>

More information about the Reproducible-builds mailing list