testing migration aging and reproducible builds

[Ivo De Decker]

Hi Vagrant,

On 7/21/19 4:55 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:

> I think it's:
> 
>    https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/reproducible-tracker.json
> 
> Which only shows results for "bullseye" (formerly only "buster).
> 
> We wanted to filter out the unstable and experimental suites from the
> tracker which may have larger numbers of variations (e.g. build path),
> some of which may be just be distracting to developers at this point
> until we have a more complete fix for those issues.
> 
> I'm not sure relying on our test infrastructure at the moment is the
> right approach long-term, maybe fine in the short-term.
> 
> We really need to start doing verification of buildd builds rather than
> simply rebuilding packages twice with variations. Was hoping to put
> together a BoF this week with DSA about that; maybe release team would
> also be interested?

Sure, just let me know the details.

Ivo