Bug#969084: buildd.d.o: please don't use a tainted buildenv

Mattia Rizzolo mattia at debian.org
Thu Sep 10 12:45:31 BST 2020

On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:01:01AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Well I would say that we have a solution but not yet the patch, but
> anyway I'll plan to work on writing a patch in the next days.

Oh, great!
thank you for being so quick!

> > > Improvement would be to ship
> > > that single conffile in a separate package (which, IMHO,
> > > src:policy-rcd-declarative could do, i.e. provide a
> > > "policy-rcd-declarative-deny-all" binary; or do fancy things with a
> > > debconf option sbuild-createchroot could inject but that would be too
> > > dirty for me).
> > 
> > I'm tempted to clone this bug and make the clone a wishlist bug for such
> > a "policy-rcd-declarative-deny-all" binary. What do you think?
> Indeed, that would be awesome.

I opened a new bug instead, to give the policy-rcd-declarative
maintainer some context without being shoved a bugload of comments ^^


                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20200910/f8f76955/attachment.sig>

More information about the Reproducible-builds mailing list