maintaining reproducible-notes over the long term

[Holger Levsen]

Hey,

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:41:56PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I've often quietly wondered about maintenance of our
> "reproducible-notes" issues, and was recently reminded by:
[...] 
> So not really sure what to think; I see value cleaning and maintaining
> current status 

yes, that's the reason why a long time ago we decided to remove notes...

>  yet also see value in keeping history a little easier to
> reach than grepping through git logs.

right.

you also said on irc:

"please wait at least until packages are verified as reproducible in 
bullseye on all architectures before removing them from
reproducible-notes ... there are some packages which have intermitant
reproducibility issues"

which AIUI can be solved by adjusting the scripts Mattia is running
in cron. I just don't remember where exactly they live... Mattia?


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁       holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

“If the fires of 2020 horrify you, consider that, no matter what we do, by
 2050, when the benefits of even fast climate action will only begin to arrive,
 the area burned annually in the (US) West is expected to at least double and
 perhaps quadruple.” (David Wallace-Wells)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20201218/d0ab4e07/attachment.sig>