randomness_in_r_rdb_rds_databases not very random?

[Holger Levsen]

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 09:37:07AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I've noticed nearly all of the packages marked
> "randomness_in_r_rdb_rds_databases" actaully appear to be not random at
> all, but rather a deterministic result derived from the build path:
> 
> ~1200 packages that FTBR in unstable:
> ~1200 build reproducibly in bookworm:

good catch!
 
[...] 
> Should this be clarified somehow?

I'd say so, yes.

> Our notes are generally a best effort thing and we don't want to get too
> caught up in exacting details or semantic arguments, but it might be
> good to be more specific when we can? :)

sure! :)


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Covid is like the flu.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20220413/98f1c484/attachment.sig>