Please review the draft for September's report

[Chris Lamb]

Hi Richard^WRoland,

> I've pushed 2 corrections:

Thank you for these.

> 2) Precision: The cannonical timestamp is for Debian, not 'an archive'. 
> You might want to split this now into two sentences, since the content 
> is not related.

Ah, can you go ahead and change this yourself?  You can probably do
this better than I can as you have all of the context, after all...


Best wishes,

-- 
      o
    ⬋   ⬊      Chris Lamb
   o     o     reproducible-builds.org 💠
    ⬊   ⬋
      o