Proposal for making Multi-Arch:same binNMU-safe
Holger Levsen
holger at layer-acht.org
Fri Apr 17 17:26:08 BST 2026
On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 01:32:11AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> AFAIR I already suggested somewhere in these discussions that the date
> of a binNMU could be the date of the source upload plus the binNMU
> number added in seconds (e.g. +b5 is 5 seconds after the source upload).
this seems like a rather simple solution for this problem which I believe
is much preferable to the quite complex solution Helmut proposed in the
initial mail to this thread.
I still think we should replace binNMUs with proper sourceful uploads,
because having source packages which dont contain the full sources are
annoying & harmful, but... perfect is the enemy of good, so yay, progress!
(that's #894441: binNMUs should be replaced by easy "no-change-except-debian/changelog-uploads")
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
Bottled water companies don't produce water, they produce plastic bottles.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/reproducible-builds/attachments/20260417/d8911ca9/attachment.sig>
More information about the Reproducible-builds
mailing list