[sane-devel] OS/2 version of Sane
Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:40:58 +0100
yes, please send me the diff for the microtek2 backend.
Which type of scanner was tested?
Franz Bakan wrote:
> 1. mustek.c and microtek2.c
> As you probably allready know, the code for backends using fork()
> needs small changes to work with OS/2.
> I can provide diffs for mustek.c, mustek.h and microtek2.c, based on
> the work of Yuri Dario, if you are willing to include them.
> Additionally sanei/sanei_thread.c would have to be added to
> It would be easy to implement these changes also for
> plustek, coolscan, agfafocus, snapscan and tamarack, but
> I will only add these if I have a chance to get this tested first.
> Regarding mustek and microtek I know that it works.
> 2. sanei/sanei_scsi.c
> I would like to make some changes here (OS/2-things only):
> - remove semaphore() code because it is no longer necessary.
> (This breaks backwards compatibility with aspirout.sys 1.01
> aspirout.sys beta2 or later from Paul Ratcliffe is needed then.)
> - add:
> #if USE == OS2_INTERFACE
> # define MAX_DATA (64*1024)
> But I'm not shure here. I did not have troubles with this, and it speeds up
> the things slightly, but perhaps there is a reason I don't know why the
> former (implicit) value was 32*1024.
> - add some debug-code
> sanei_scsi.c modified this way works at least for me (EPSON and Mustek)
> and a Microtek-scanner of another OS/2-Sane-User.
> Are there other OS/2 users on the list to comment these idea's?
> 3. Allthough I get SANE built on OS/2 it's a little bit tricky.
> OS/2 executables need the .exe extension to work.
> So in theory things should improve if
> were added to configure.in
> I don't know much about these things, but as far as I know
> this would also need autoconf 2.13 at least.
> At the moment configure.in tells:
> AC_PREREQ(2.10)dnl dnl Minimum Autoconf version required.
> Sane-devel mailing list