[sane-devel] Q: Performance Tip wanted, USB vs. SCSI HP 63xx Scanner

[Juergen Sauer]

Am Freitag, 23. November 2001 00:19 schrieben Sie:
> option enable-image-buffering

Somewhat thing was what I'm looking for.

It is not nessessary to have the same Device-Bandwith to the ram as with 
SCSI. Scanning time is not important. My topic is more to save the 
scanner's mechanical lifietime.

But this did not helped here.
During preview scan xsane .81+ sane 1.06 I recognize a ugly misbehavior:
the scanner moves forward-stop-little backward-stop- etc. instead of 
moving counitnuesly until buffer full - stop transfer - go on.

This behavior sounds like a cruel mechanical torture - HP's hardware 
quality is not the same as for a few years, this way the scanner will 
probably break soon. 

Any idea what's going on there - any idea ?

mfG
	Jojo

-- 
Jürgen Sauer - AutomatiX GmbH, +49-4209-4699, jojo at automatix.de **
** Das Linux Systemhaus - Service - Support - Server - Lösungen **
http://www.automatix.de to Mail me: remove: -not-for-spawm-     **