[sane-devel] film scanner recommendation
Karl Heinz Kremer
khk@khk.net
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 09:24:39 -0400
--dc+cDN39EJAMEtIO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 02:44:35PM -0400, Roland Roberts wrote:
> >>>>> "Witold" =3D=3D Witold Paluszynski <witold@ict.pwr.wroc.pl> writes:
>=20
> Witold> The resolution need not be much above 2000 dpi. The price
> Witold> however, is of concern, anything above $500 is out of
> Witold> question.
>=20
> If you find something which meets these constraints, please let
> everyone know. As someone who recently went on a search for a film
> scanner, I found nothing in the 2000dpi and up range for under $500.
> I elected to purchase a flatbed with a built-in transparency adapter
> in the lid, but....
>=20
> Witold> Please do not suggest paper scanners with transparency
> Witold> adapters.
>=20
> Since you ask me not, to, I won't. But I suspect this is your best
> bet for meeting your price constraint.
I still don't suggest any particular flatbed, but you should at least
take a look at this review. It compares two flatbed scanners with
two film scanners:
http://www.virtualtraveller.org/epson2450p4.htm
There are more pages specifically about the EPSON Perfection 2540, but
just to get an idea about how good or bad a flatbed is compared to
a film scanner, this page should be sufficient.
BTW: The Acer ScanWit would be in your price range, I just don't know
if it's supported by Sane.
Karl Heinz
--=20
Karl Heinz Kremer khk@khk.net
PGP Key at http://www.khk.net/download/khk.asc
EPSON Sane Backend: http://www.khk.net
--dc+cDN39EJAMEtIO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9DJGXxejv3RfKrhsRAvbLAKCc1oUclZ0rIp9ZHismUWWM8iW4OwCglTTl
NLxTZEszIa7cF/oabIX2oM8=
=fdFt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--dc+cDN39EJAMEtIO--