[sane-devel] 44-10 vs epson 1250

[Till Kamppeter]

When I have only an Epson Perfection 1260 connected ("plustek" driver) 
the "snapscan" backend takes around 15 seconds, with "snapscan" 
commented out xsnae needs less than 10 seconds to start, with "snapscan" 
around 25. "mustek-usb" is on the second place with something like two 
seconds.

I have also installed the Mandrake packages of HPOJ (with "rpm -Uvh 
--nodeps" because the Mandrake package of SANE is not installed). The 
"hpoj" scanner backend runs under SANE 1.0.9 without problems. There are 
also no delays on xsane startup when the HP PSC 950 is turned off or 
when the ptal-mlcd daemon is not running. So all works as expected. With 
both devices (Epson Perfection 1260 and HP PSC 950) connected I get, as 
expected, a menu to choose the device to use.

My System: Asus S8600 notebook with Intel PIII 850 MHz, 192 MB RAM, 
Mandrake 9.0, kernel 2.4.19-16mdk, usb-uhci, HPOJ 0.9, libusb 0.1.6a.

    Till


Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:09:06PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> 
>>Then having had to go into the icons preferences and find the new 
>>xsane and set that, I fired it off.  Past the root warning and it 
>>then says "scanning for devices" and hangs seemingly forever as I 
>>eventualy had to kill it with kpm. I just started it again after 
>>doing a sane-frontends-1.0.8  make install, and its been hung now 
>>for about 2 minutes.  But a ctrl-alt-esc plus a click on it kills 
>>it.
> 
> 
> Running xsane from an xterm like this:
> 
> SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255 xsane
> 
> should print the backend that takes that long. Tell us, which one it
> is and comment it out in dll.conf (if it's not plustek itsself).
> 
> Bye,
>   Henning
> _______________________________________________
> Sane-devel mailing list
> Sane-devel@www.mostang.com
> http://www.mostang.com/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
> 
>