[sane-devel] opticpro9636 T

Ernie Schroder schroder@ntplx.net
Thu, 15 May 2003 17:39:26 -0400


On Thursday 15 May 2003 05:21 pm, a tiny voice compelled you to write:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sending this back to the sane-devel list as I personally don't
> have much experience with the plustek backend. Still trying to
> answer...
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 04:47:31PM -0400, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> >  # SANE_DEBUG_PLUSTEK=255 scanimage -L
> > [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of plustek to 255.
> > [plustek] Plustek backend V0.44-10, part of sane-backends 1.0.9
> > [plustek] ># Plustek-SANE Backend configuration file<
> > [plustek] ># For use with Plustek parallel-port scanners and<
> > [plustek] ># LM9831/2/3 based USB scanners<
> > [plustek] ><
> > [plustek] ># For parport devices use the parport section<
> > [plustek] >#<
> > [plustek] >[parport]<
> > [plustek] next device is a PARPORT device
> > [plustek] >device /dev/pt_drv<
> > [plustek] Decoding device name >/dev/pt_drv<
> > [plustek] ><
> > [plustek] >#<
> > [plustek] ># leave the default values as specified in
> > /etc/modules.conf< [plustek] >#<
> > [plustek] >#option warmup=30<
> > [plustek] >#option lOffOnEnd=0<
> > [plustek] >#option lampOff=0<
> > [plustek] >#option port=0x378<
> > [plustek] ><
> >
> > > The device node for the pt_drv in /dev does exist and the user
> > > has access permissions for it?
> >
> > there is a /dev/scanner/pt_drv.(no /dev/pt_drv) Permissions are ok:
> > ls -l /dev/scanner/pt_drv0
> > crwxrwxrw-    1 root     wheel     40,   0 Dec 31  1969
> > /dev/scanner/pt_drv0
>
> The path is wrong. It's /dev/pt_drv. Or change plustek.conf to
> /dev/scanner/pt_drv.
>
> > and as root I do:
> > scanimage --device-name plustek:/dev/scanner/pt_drv0
> > scanimage: open of device plustek:/dev/scanner/pt_drv failed: Error
> > during device I/O
> >
> > should I sym-link /dev/scanner/pt_drv0 to /dev/pt_drv?
>
> Yes, that's another way to do it.

I tried the sym-link, no help

How do I remove the  plustek-module-0_40_17 so I can built plustek 
module: 0_42_9?



-- 
Regards, Ernie
100% Microsoft and Intel free