[sane-devel] Dusting-off with the Gimp/Coolscan2

Wed, 21 May 2003 00:46:34 +0200

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------020708030909090402000102
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Can you explain more, may be on your site, with exemples
please

Georges

Jonathan Buzzard wrote:

>georges.roux@pacageek.org said:
>  
>
>>Why don't you change gamma, to dust off? 
>>    
>>
>
>That shows a profound lack of understanding of what is going on.
>Changing the gamma setting is *not* the same as using a separate
>infrared scan of the image to find out where the dust is, and then
>using a special algorithm to patch the surrounding bits of image in
>to cover it up.
>
>JAB.
>
>  
>

--------------020708030909090402000102
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body>
Can you explain more, may be on your site, with exemples <br>
please<br>
<br>
Georges<br>
<br>
Jonathan Buzzard wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="midE19I5Ib-00014S-00@jelly.buzzard.org.uk">
  <pre wrap=""><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:georges.roux@pacageek.org">georges.roux@pacageek.org</a> said:
  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">Why don't you change gamma, to dust off? 
    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
That shows a profound lack of understanding of what is going on.
Changing the gamma setting is *not* the same as using a separate
infrared scan of the image to find out where the dust is, and then
using a special algorithm to patch the surrounding bits of image in
to cover it up.

JAB.

  </pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------020708030909090402000102--