[sane-devel] Canoscan Lide 20, suse 9.3

[John Charles Considine]

On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 11:23 +0200, Johannes Meixner wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> On Aug 24 14:26 John Charles Considine wrote (shortened):
> > When configuring a Canon Lide20 scanner through Yast, the scanner is
> > detected as:
> > 
> > "USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x2213 [CanoScan],
> > chip=GL841) at libusb:001:003"
> > 
> > yet when I associate it with the Canoscan Lide20 scanner, the plustek
> > driver is associated, but the 'Associated Scanner' remains blank.
> 
> Was the "plustek" line really activated in /etc/sane.d/dll.conf?

#pint
plustek
#plustek_pp
#pnm

> > Tardis:~ # sane-find-scanner
> ...
> > found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon], product=0x2213 [CanoScan],
> > chip=GL841)
> 
> Strange, here the "at libusb:001:003" is missing.
> Is it listed in the output of the "/sbin/lsusb" command?
> 

Tardis:~ # /sbin/lsusb
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 0000:0000
Bus 001 Device 005: ID 04a9:2213 Canon, Inc. LiDE 50/LiDE 35
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 0000:0000

...and therein lies the answer.  My scanner isn't a lide20 after all.

I'll wait for the updated genesys backend.

Thank you Johannes.

> > Tardis:~ # scanimage -L
> > 
> > No scanners were identified...
> 
> Which sane package version do you use?
> The sane package from the Suse Linux 9.3 CDs or something else?
> 
> See
> http://portal.suse.com/sdb/en/2004/10/jsmeix_scanner-setup-92.html
> "Trouble-Shooting (Debugging)"
> how to provide debugging information.
> 
> Kind Regards
> Johannes Meixner
> -- 
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5      Mail: jsmeix at suse.de
> 90409 Nuernberg, Germany                    WWW: http://www.suse.de/
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20050824/d41b047a/attachment.htm