[sane-devel] Canon FB630u with Kernel 2.6

[cneugeb@mysc.de]

Bertrik Sikken wrote:
> cneugeb@mysc.de wrote:
> > This is my output of lsusb :
> > Bus 005 Device 003: ID 07cc:0350 Carry Computer Eng., Co., Ltd
> > Bus 005 Device 001: ID 0000:0000
> > Bus 004 Device 001: ID 0000:0000
> > Bus 003 Device 001: ID 0000:0000
> > Bus 002 Device 001: ID 0000:0000
> > Bus 001 Device 003: ID 04a9:2204 Canon, Inc. CanoScan FB630U
> > Bus 001 Device 001: ID 0000:0000
> >
> >
> >
> > and I have this canonfb630u.conf file:
> >
> > # Options for the canonusb backend
> >
> > # Autodetect the Canon CanoScan FB630u
> > usb 0x04a9 0x2204
> >
> > # device list for non-linux-systems (enable if autodetect fails):
> > #/dev/scanner
> > #/dev/usb/scanner0
> > usb 0x4a9 0x2204            .
>
> The '.' at the end of the line is a cut-and-paste error I presume?

Yes, the '.' is not in the file.

>
> > scanimage -L can detect my scanner:
> > linux:/etc/sane.d # scanimage -L
> > device `canon630u:libusb:001:003' is a CANON Canoscan FB630U flatbed
> > scanner
>
> Good. This means a lot of stuff works already.
>
> > but when I try to scan:
> > linux:/etc/sane.d # scanimage
> > scanimage: sane_start: Device busy
> >
> > and I get those entrys in /var/log/messages
> > Jan 11 21:34:40 linux scanimage: resmgr: server response code 502
> > Jan 11 21:34:40 linux last message repeated 8 times
> > Jan 11 21:34:40 linux scanimage: resmgr: server response code 200
> > Jan 11 21:34:40 linux last message repeated 4 times
> > Jan 11 21:34:40 linux scanimage: resmgr: server response code 501
> > Jan 11 21:35:10 linux kernel: usb 1-1: control timeout on ep0out
> > Jan 11 21:35:10 linux kernel: usb 1-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd
> > scanimage rqt 64 rq 12 len 1 ret -110
> > Jan 11 21:35:10 linux kernel: usb 1-1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd
> > scanimage rqt 64 rq 12 len 1 ret -71
>
> No idea why it says "USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed", could be a kernel
> problem. Also the "scanimage: resmgr: server response code" does
> not look familiar to me, sorry.
>
> Stupid question: does it work when you run it as root?
>
> Regards,
> Bertrik

No, it does not work when I try it as root, no difference if I call it as root or as normal user.

Regards
Christian

__________________________________________________
:-) kassiere für jede versandte eMail 2,0 Cent (-:
    http://www.mysc.de --- http://www.mysc.at