[sane-devel] Going forwared with SANE
Alessandro Zummo
azummo-lists at towertech.it
Mon Dec 17 18:50:20 UTC 2007
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:44:31 +0100
Julien BLACHE <jb at jblache.org> wrote:
> > we could, but every answer will be different or, at least, slightly
> > different.
>
> Then, we can't answer it. As long as what you wrote will hold, then it
> means we can't answer that (rather crucial) question.
>
> > if we answer, who will take the burden of actually choice
> > a single answer?
>
> Everybody interested in SANE will take the burden of developing it
> further. But that requires a rough form of consensus first.
Yes, and given we have not reached it in years, I'm not so
confident that we would be able to do it now.
I think we have a split situation in which each "side" has
probably some 50% . And I don't really have an answer on
how to solve that.
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
More information about the sane-devel
mailing list