[sane-devel] SANE2, what do we want ?
jb at jblache.org
Tue Apr 8 16:52:02 UTC 2008
Lei Chen <Raymond.Chen at Sun.COM> wrote:
>> agreed. if i were to make sane2 myself, i would change the license to
>> straight GPL3.
> Why not LGPL? Is LGPL not so straight for libraries and dynamic
> objects? The current license makes thing complex. People have to pay
> close attention to GPL libraries and backends, with or without that
> exception claiming, in SANE.
All backends in SANE are GPL + exception, which is roughly equivalent
to the LGPL.
Relicensing SANE is not possible, because quite a few copyright
holders cannot be reached to obtain permission.
Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org>
<jb at jblache.org> GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169
More information about the sane-devel