[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 90
Guillaume Gastebois
guillaume.gastebois at free.fr
Tue Feb 19 08:17:12 UTC 2008
Hello,
OK, I'll try this tonight. What is the best : WITH or WITHOUT
SCAN_FLAG_DISABLE_LAMP ?
Regards
Guillaume
Selon Pierre Willenbrock <pierre at pirsoft.dnsalias.org>:
> Guillaume Gastebois schrieb:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I made two tests today :
> >
> > test 1 : too bright/too dard = 10/65525 WITH flag :
> > SCAN_FLAG_DISABLE_LAMP. Result can bee found on :
> > http://ggastebois.free.fr/lide90_snoop/18_test1.tar
> >
> > test 2 : too bright/too dard = 10/65525 WITHOUT flag :
> > SCAN_FLAG_DISABLE_LAMP. Result can bee found on :
> > http://ggastebois.free.fr/lide90_snoop/18_test2.tar
> >
>
> Not what i expected, although the debug images are looking good.
>
> Please try to change the first pixel used for minimum calculation to 200
> at about lines 4596 and 4712:
> - for (i = 0; i < num_pixels; i++)
> + for (i = 150; i < num_pixels; i++)
> {
> if (dev->model->is_cis)
> val =
>
>
> Regards,
> Pierre
>
More information about the sane-devel
mailing list