[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 90

[Guillaume Gastebois]

Hello,

I modified lines 4596 and 4712 and reenable SCAN_FLAG_DISABLE_LAMP flag.
Result can be found on : http://ggastebois.free.fr/lide90_snoop/19_test1.tar

Regards
Guillaume

Pierre Willenbrock a écrit :
> Guillaume Gastebois schrieb:
>> Hello,
>>
>> OK, I'll try this tonight. What is the best : WITH or WITHOUT
>> SCAN_FLAG_DISABLE_LAMP ?
> 
> Not using SCAN_FLAG_DISABLE_LAMP is a bit counter productive when trying
> to get black levels on a white-only calibration area.
> 
> Regards,
>   Pierre
> 
>> Regards
>> Guillaume
>>
>> Selon Pierre Willenbrock <pierre at pirsoft.dnsalias.org>:
>>
>>> Guillaume Gastebois schrieb:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I made two tests today :
>>>>
>>>> test 1 : too bright/too dard = 10/65525 WITH flag :
>>>> SCAN_FLAG_DISABLE_LAMP. Result can bee found on :
>>>> http://ggastebois.free.fr/lide90_snoop/18_test1.tar
>>>>
>>>> test 2 : too bright/too dard = 10/65525 WITHOUT flag :
>>>> SCAN_FLAG_DISABLE_LAMP. Result can bee found on :
>>>> http://ggastebois.free.fr/lide90_snoop/18_test2.tar
>>>>
>>> Not what i expected, although the debug images are looking good.
>>>
>>> Please try to change the first pixel used for minimum calculation to 200
>>> at about lines 4596 and 4712:
>>> -      for (i = 0; i < num_pixels; i++)
>>> +      for (i = 150; i < num_pixels; i++)
>>>       {
>>> 	  if (dev->model->is_cis)
>>> 	      val =
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>   Pierre
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
>