[sane-devel] How come ghostscript compresses so much better than xsane
jb at jblache.org
Thu Jul 10 11:44:29 UTC 2008
Julien Michielsen <julien at michkloo.xs4all.nl> wrote:
> I raised this point earlier on this list, but either I didn't formulate
> it right, or I didn't understand the answer. I still keep wondering that
> the compressing knowledge of gs is not incorporated in xsane.
gs embeds a JPEG stream in the PDF, xpdf does not and embeds
compressed raw data into the PDF.
Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org>
<jb at jblache.org> GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169
More information about the sane-devel