[sane-devel] saned -d6 OK saned fails [GishPuppy]
m. allan noah
kitno455 at gmail.com
Wed Mar 19 14:58:01 UTC 2008
see all those 'Address already in use' statements? something is
already listening on the port, perhaps inetd?
allan
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Geoff Lane <bunsen at tesco.net> wrote:
> On 18 Mar 2008 at 10:27, m. allan noah wrote:
>
> I have checked everything listed below and all looks fine.
>
> Inetutils-inetd is shown (Via ps -Af) running as ROOT
>
> What is puzzling me is the output of manually running saned with different values after
> the d flag, d5 and above and it works, less than d5 and it doesn't work.
>
> Output as follows;
>
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> geoff at challenger:~$ saned -d1
> [saned] main: [1] bind failed: Address already in use
>
> geoff at challenger:~$ saned -d4
> [saned] main: starting debug mode (level 4)
> [saned] main: [1] bind failed: Address already in use
> [saned] main: waiting for control connection
>
> geoff at challenger:~$ saned -d5
> [saned] main: starting debug mode (level 5)
> [saned] main: trying to get port for service `sane-port' (getaddrinfo)
> [saned] main: [0] socket () using IPv6
> [saned] main: [0] setsockopt ()
> [saned] main: [0] bind () to port 6566
> [saned] main: [0] listen ()
> [saned] main: [1] socket () using IPv4
> [saned] main: [1] setsockopt ()
> [saned] main: [1] bind () to port 6566
> [saned] main: [1] bind failed: Address already in use
> [saned] main: waiting for control connection
>
> geoff at challenger:~$
> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Geoff Lane
>
> > reading the config line from right to left:
> >
> > listen on port 'saned', run program '/usr/sbin/saned' as user and
> > group 'saned', and hand it the tcp stream.
> >
> > so, check that you have saned listed in /etc/services, the binary
> > saned in /usr/sbin, the user saned in /etc/passwd, and the group saned
> > in /etc/group. that should get inetd to actually listen on the port,
> > and start the saned binary when you connect.
> >
> > now, the scanner device files have their own permissions, which are
> > managed by various hotplug/udev type scripts, depending on the
> > OS/distro. the user saned must have permission to read/write to these
> > files as well. If your OS uses a 'scanner' group, you will probably
> > have to add 'saned' user to that group. If your system uses some other
> > mechanism, we will try to figure it out.
>
--
"The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
More information about the sane-devel
mailing list