[sane-devel] Migrate from CVS to SVN or DVCS?
rene at exactcode.de
Wed Oct 22 11:53:31 UTC 2008
Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> Is there any interest in migrating SANE's CVS to a newer revision control
> Subversion would be an improvement for its repository-wide revision
> A DVCS such as git would be even more interesting, given the apparent
> number of people who could contribute code and/or scanner test data.
> I became interested in this when planning to make a CVS snapshot package
> to use some of our scanner hardware. I realized I didn't know offhand how
> to refer to a particular revision of the whole tree with CVS.
> With DVCS, maintainers could pull from anyone's repository which
> contains useful changesets, and perhaps the newer RCS systems'
> export features would make incremental releases easier.
It's not that we have too many people contributing code to coordinate.
I find git overly cryptic to be help me to actually think of coding,
distributed systems I prefer Mercurial (hg) most.
So my votes are svn or hg.
René Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin
http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name
More information about the sane-devel