[sane-devel] New backend for a not yet exisiting device
m. allan noah
kitno455 at gmail.com
Mon Sep 15 15:46:46 UTC 2008
I think you would want to stick with lower level (stupid) machines
that have chips from a third party which gives away documentation on
their website. Something like rts* gt*, genesys backends should be
useful. If you sensor sled is going to weigh more than the original,
or if you use a different motor, you will probably want to use a
scanner that gets its motor acceleration tables from the driver
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Torsten Wagner
<torsten.wagner at fh-aachen.de> wrote:
> Dear Dev-Team,
> first of all I'm a complete newbie in terms of scanners resp. the development
> of sane. I hope you can help me a bit to sort out some questions.
> Background: We are going to develop a new kind of scientific measurement
> device which acts similar to a scanner. Our measurements are latterly
> resolved e.g. we can create a pixel by pixel map whereas the measurement
> signal might be represented by a colour. This is, so fare well known already
> for similar devices already (Actually, it is not different to a normal
> scanner). Our reading unit can read line by line and thus we are thinking to
> use the mechanical set-up of a normal scanner to acquire a complete picture.
> Idea: For sure, it would be perfect, if we can address this type of new
> scanner in the same way like a normal scanner. E.g. by TWAIN-Protocol or by
> SANE. This guarantees to capture measurements many kind of different
> Problem: I have totally no idea how the communication between a scanner and
> the computer works. I read about intelligent scanners which just get commands
> like "scan with 600dpi one A4 page" and about dumb scanners which requires
> commands like "turn on stepper motor for next line, scan line, etc."
> Is there any information available which might help me to identify which basic
> scanner set-up might be the best for our purpose. I guess the dumb version
> gives us access to lower level functions which we might need ?Any kind of
> this hacks known already ?
> Does somebody know a scanner brand or a specific model which is easy hackable
> for our purpose. Is there one out with full open/known programming interface
> or does this require always a reverse engineering of all the different
> commands ? Is there a sane-dev favourite scanner due to the easiness of use
> and addressing ? A USB-model might be preferable but a LPT-based model might
> be easier to access ?!
> I appreciate any kind of information and help.
> Best regards
> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
> to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
"The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
More information about the sane-devel