[sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or scanimage

[Myroslav Kavatsyuk]

Dear Stef,

I have changed the canon.c file as you have suggested. This
fixed the bug. Here is the output of the diff command between
modified and original canon.c files:

1613d1612
<   s->opt[OPT_CALIBRATION_GROUP].cap=SANE_CAP_ADVANCED;
1657d1655
<   s->opt[OPT_EJECT_GROUP].cap=SANE_CAP_ADVANCED;

Please commit this change to the git repository.

Best regards,
Myroslav


--- On Sun, 11/14/10, stef <stef.dev at free.fr> wrote:

> From: stef <stef.dev at free.fr>
> Subject: Re: [sane-devel] Possible bug in canon backend or > scanimage
> To: "Myroslav Kavatsyuk" <m.kavatsyuk at yahoo.com>
> Cc: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> Date: Sunday, November 14, 2010, 8:36 PM
> Le Saturday 13 November 2010 14:12:19
> Myroslav Kavatsyuk, vous avez écrit :
> > Dear Stef,
> > 
> > Please find attached log of initialization and preview
> done
> > wit the Canoscan 8400F, using correct program.
> > 
> > What shell we do with the bug in canon backend? Are
> you
> > going to fix it, or shell I change the code and send
> you
> > corrected version?
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Myroslav
> > 
>     Hello,
> 
>     thanks for the data. I'll have a look at
> it soon.
> 
>     Since you have to device to test, I
> think it would be better if you could 
> create a patch for the canon backend. The fix in canon.c to
> try is to add a 
> line:
> s->opt[OPT_CALIBRATION_GROUP].cap=SANE_CAP_ADVANCED;
> and:
> s->opt[OPT_EJECT_GROUP].cap=SANE_CAP_ADVANCED;
> before the test for SANE_CAP_INACTIVE. Once you have it
> working, send the 
> patch to the list so we can apply it.
> 
> Regards,
>     Stef
> 
> 
>