[sane-devel] Canon LiDE 210 issue - exceeds maximum scan height?

[stef]

Le Thursday 13 January 2011 00:37:52 Heinz Wiesinger, vous avez écrit :
> On Wednesday 12 January 2011 21:05:09 you wrote:
> > Le Wednesday 12 January 2011 08:41:55 Heinz Wiesinger, vous avez écrit :
> > > On Wednesday 12 January 2011 06:52:35 stef wrote:
> > > > Le Wednesday 12 January 2011 00:21:35 Heinz Wiesinger, vous avez écrit 
:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > > 
> > > > > I got myself a Canon LiDE 210 today and immediatly tried it with
> > > > > latest git (922a22e). It was detected fine and it seems to work
> > > > > pretty good as well.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Preview works fine, but I noticed that after the actual scanning
> > > > > run, when the scanhead is parked again, it tries to go back too
> > > > > far. It does not happen after the preview run, only after the
> > > > > scan.
> > > > > 
> > > > > If there is anything else I can provide to help get this bug fixed,
> > > > > don't hesitate to contact me :)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Grs,
> > > > > Heinz
> > > > 	
> > > > 	Hello,
> > > > 	
> > > > 	when you wait for the scanning head to park before each scans no
> > > > 	mare
> > > > 
> > > > motor noise), do you have the same issue ?
> > > 
> > > Interesting, I thought I had tested that case as well, but apparently I
> > > didn't.
> > > It's true, if I wait between each scan nothing happens, the head is
> > > parked correctly. If I do not wait, or specify multiple scans from the
> > > beginning, it has issues.
> > > 
> > > Grs,
> > > Heinz
> > 	
> > 	OK,
> > 	
> > 	thanks for the tests. I have just pushed a fixed for this bug to the git
> > 
> > source tree.
> 
> Thank you very much. Confirmed working now here as well :)
> 
> > 	BTW, do you have a windows environment where you can run your LiDE 210?
> > 
> > Does the windows proposes a 2400 dpi resolution ? In this case I'd be
> > much interested by a log recorded with
> > http://www.pcausa.com/Utilities/UsbSnoop/ of a very small area scanned
> > at 2400 dpi.
> 
> Hmm, I'm not sure. The list only offered up to 1200 dpi, but it was
> editable. So I tried defining 2400 dpi and from what I can see it worked.
> At least gimp reports the scanned image with 2400 dpi. I did the same for
> 4800 dpi as well, don't know if it is useful or not.
> 
> I tried to get as small as possible scans, maybe it ended up too small. If
> so tell me and I'll run it again. I uploaded the logs to my server, they
> are available here: http://www.liwjatan.at/files/logs/
> 
> Hope that helps! :)
> 
> Grs,
> Heinz
	Hello,

	thanks for the logs. I see no 2400 or 4800 resolution in it. However I 
managed to get 2400 dpi work for LiDE 110 and 210. I've just pushed it in the 
git source tree.

Regards,
	Stef