[sane-devel] Device recognition
jb at jblache.org
Fri Jun 24 20:22:03 UTC 2011
Olaf Meeuwissen <olaf.meeuwissen at avasys.jp> wrote:
> I just found another use case for that on-line ID to backend/driver
> mapping I mentioned in my earlier post: tallying device IDs.
Sure, though not everybody has a permanent network connection.
>> Given the shortage of manpower SANE is facing, it's valuable info too.
> Indeed. It gives you an idea of what still needs to be done and what
> will have the most impact.
And, more importantly, what to dump overboard because nobody EVER uses
>> It's true we've got that one already so another wildcard here won't
>> matter much. Oh well. I'll commit the change :)
It's in :)
>>> # Here's me wishing USB had a scanner class ... :-(
>> ISTR it was part of the USB spec at some point.
> I seem to remember something close, seeing it in a USB *draft* spec.
Yup, that's it. I also seem to remember some telling UVC would "fit"
both video cameras and scanners.
>>> The more scanners Just Work out-of-the-box the
>> What follows is by no means directed to you personally. Now, ...
> I know, but that doesn't mean I don't cringe ;-)
Julien BLACHE <http://www.jblache.org>
<jb at jblache.org> GPG KeyID 0xF5D65169
More information about the sane-devel