[sane-devel] Canon DR-3010C scanner

Milko Simeonov msimeonov at INTEPRO-BG.COM
Mon Nov 26 14:59:07 UTC 2012


Hi Allan,

Yes, we are able to scan now through the main scanner (DR-3010C). What's left to be done is to be able to scan using an add-on device (canon flatbed scanner unit 101) that we have. It works like this - the main scanner is connected to the flatbed unit via USB cable, and the flatbed unit is connected to the PC via another USB cable (apparently the flatbed has a built-in usb hub). 

I've connected the devices now as they should be connected, I continue to be able to scan via the main scanner.  

The flatbed unit has an USB ID of its own, lsusb returns:
Bus 002 Device 023: ID 1083:162e Canon Electronics, Inc.

I can also see it in /var/log/messages:
Nov 26 16:53:30 itp01 kernel: usb 2-1.3.1: new high speed USB device number 26 using ehci_hcd
Nov 26 16:53:30 itp01 kernel: usb 2-1.3.1: New USB device found, idVendor=1083, idProduct=162e
Nov 26 16:53:30 itp01 kernel: usb 2-1.3.1: New USB device strings: Mfr=10, Product=11, SerialNumber=0
Nov 26 16:53:30 itp01 kernel: usb 2-1.3.1: Product: CANON Flatbed Scanner Unit 101
Nov 26 16:53:30 itp01 kernel: usb 2-1.3.1: Manufacturer: CANON

What can we do to make it work? Maybe I need to add the usb id in the canon_dr.conf file?

Cheers,
Milko


>>> "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> 11/26/12 4:20 PM >>>
Ok- now, in the sane-backends source, edit backend/canon_dr.c

Find the function init_model. In that function, there is a section for
the DR-2510C. Copy that section, and change it to match the DR-3010C.
In your new section, also add this:

s->invert_tly = 1;

Then recompile and reinstall. Hopefully you will be able to scan.

allan

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Milko Simeonov
<msimeonov at intepro-bg.com> wrote:
> OK, I've installed them back, they were sane-backends ,
> sane-backends-autoconfig, hplip, hplip-sane and simple-scan .
>
> "scanimage -L" returns:
> device `canon_dr:libusb:002:020' is a CANON DR-3010C scanner
>
> Milko
>
>
>>>> "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> 11/26/12 4:08 PM >>>
>
> You probably should not un-install all the factory sane packages, as
> that will remove frontend programs, and udev rules too. Generally, I
> build sane-backends to overwrite the factory install.
>
> What is the output of scanimage -L when run as root?
>
> allan
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Milko Simeonov
> <msimeonov at intepro-bg.com> wrote:
>> Hi Allan,
>>
>> OK, I've uninstalled all sane-related packages that came with the distro
>> and
>> then I did (as root):
>>
>> git clone git://git.debian.org/sane/sane-backends.git
>>
>> ./configure --enable-libusb_1_0
>>
>> make
>>
>> make install
>>
>> All went fine.
>>
>> "scanimage -V" now returns:
>>
>> scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.24git; backend version 1.0.24
>>
>> "scanimage -T" returned:
>> Created directory: /var/lib/net-snmp/mib_indexes
>> scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument
>>
>> "sane-find-scanner" returned:
>> # sane-find-scanner will now attempt to detect your scanner. If the
>> # result is different from what you expected, first make sure your
>> # scanner is powered up and properly connected to your computer.
>>
>> # No SCSI scanners found. If you expected something different, make sure
>> that
>> # you have loaded a kernel SCSI driver for your SCSI adapter.
>>
>> could not fetch string descriptor: Pipe error
>> could not fetch string descriptor: Pipe error
>> # No USB scanners found. If you expected something different, make sure
>> that
>> # you have loaded a kernel driver for your USB host controller and have
>> setup
>> # the USB system correctly. See man sane-usb for details.
>>
>> # Not checking for parallel port scanners.
>>
>> # Most Scanners connected to the parallel port or other proprietary ports
>> # can't be detected by this program.
>>
>> What should I do next?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Milko
>>
>>
>>>>> "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> 11/26/12 3:13 PM >>>
>>
>> Yes, this scanner requires code changes, and has had only minimal
>> testing. Are you able to download and compile a sane-backends
>> development snapshot from here:
>>
>> http://www.sane-project.org/source.html
>>
>> If so, we can make some minor changes to the code, and at least get
>> some scans. It is possible that more changes will be required.
>>
>> allan
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Milko Simeonov
>> <msimeonov at intepro-bg.com> wrote:
>>> We have few USB scanners Canon DR-3010C which for some reason do not work
>>> under linux (openSUSE12.1, sled11sp2).
>>>
>>> lsusb returns:
>>> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
>>> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
>>> Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
>>> Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
>>> Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
>>> Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
>>> Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
>>> Bus 002 Device 002: ID 1083:161d Canon Electronics, Inc.
>>>
>>> sane-find-scanner returns:
>>> found USB scanner (vendor=0x1083, product=0x161d) at libusb:002:002
>>>
>>> In /var/log/messages you can see:
>>> Nov 26 14:49:20 sc02 kernel: [ 203.108275] usb 2-2: new high-speed USB
>>> device number 2 using ehci_hcd
>>> Nov 26 14:49:20 sc02 kernel: [ 203.243106] usb 2-2: New USB device found,
>>> idVendor=1083, idProduct=161d
>>> Nov 26 14:49:20 sc02 kernel: [ 203.243117] usb 2-2: New USB device
>>> strings:
>>> Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0
>>> Nov 26 14:49:20 sc02 kernel: [ 203.243124] usb 2-2: Product: CANON
>>> DR-3010C
>>> Nov 26 14:49:20 sc02 kernel: [ 203.243130] usb 2-2: Manufacturer: CANON
>>>
>>> So all looks fine, however if I open Yast->Scanner, select the scanner
>>> driver and do "Test", I get:
>>> Test with 'scanimage -d canon_dr:libusb:002:002 -v' failed.
>>> The results are:
>>> scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument
>>>
>>> In /etc/sane.d/canon_dr.conf you can see the following lines:
>>> # DR-3010C
>>> usb 0x1083 0x161d
>>>
>>> scanimage -V returns:
>>> scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.22; backend version 1.0.22
>>>
>>> rpm -qa | grep sane returns:
>>> sane-backends-1.0.22-15.4.1.x86_64
>>> xsane-0.998-8.1.2.x86_64
>>> hplip-sane-3.11.10-3.1.2.x86_64
>>> sane-backends-autoconfig-1.0.22-15.4.1.x86_64
>>> sane-backends-devel-1.0.22-15.4.1.x86_64
>>>
>>> Any ideas anyone?
>>>
>>> Milko
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
>>> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
>>> to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
>



-- 
"The truth is an offense, but not a sin"


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20121126/3aff2434/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the sane-devel mailing list