[sane-devel] Canon DR-3010C scanner
Milko Simeonov
msimeonov at INTEPRO-BG.COM
Mon Nov 26 15:16:15 UTC 2012
I'm happy to do all the necessary configuration and testing. I have the scanner and the flatbed unit available, we can do whatever is necessary and use all resources needed to make it work. If you're interested of course.
Cheers,
Milko
>>> "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> 11/26/12 5:07 PM >>>
This device does not use the same protocol as other DR machines. It is
actually a Gensys chipset. Stef has some more info, but I think it
will take a much more effort to make the flatbed work.
allan
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Milko Simeonov
<msimeonov at intepro-bg.com> wrote:
> Hi Allan,
>
> Yes, we are able to scan now through the main scanner (DR-3010C). What's
> left to be done is to be able to scan using an add-on device (canon flatbed
> scanner unit 101) that we have. It works like this - the main scanner is
> connected to the flatbed unit via USB cable, and the flatbed unit is
> connected to the PC via another USB cable (apparently the flatbed has a
> built-in usb hub).
>
> I've connected the devices now as they should be connected, I continue to be
> able to scan via the main scanner.
>
> The flatbed unit has an USB ID of its own, lsusb returns:
> Bus 002 Device 023: ID 1083:162e Canon Electronics, Inc.
>
> I can also see it in /var/log/messages:
> Nov 26 16:53:30 itp01 kernel: usb 2-1.3.1: new high speed USB device number
> 26 using ehci_hcd
> Nov 26 16:53:30 itp01 kernel: usb 2-1.3.1: New USB device found,
> idVendor=1083, idProduct=162e
> Nov 26 16:53:30 itp01 kernel: usb 2-1.3.1: New USB device strings: Mfr=10,
> Product=11, SerialNumber=0
> Nov 26 16:53:30 itp01 kernel: usb 2-1.3.1: Product: CANON Flatbed Scanner
> Unit 101
> Nov 26 16:53:30 itp01 kernel: usb 2-1.3.1: Manufacturer: CANON
>
> What can we do to make it work? Maybe I need to add the usb id in the
> canon_dr.conf file?
>
> Cheers,
> Milko
>
>
>>>> "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> 11/26/12 4:20 PM >>>
>
> Ok- now, in the sane-backends source, edit backend/canon_dr.c
>
> Find the function init_model. In that function, there is a section for
> the DR-2510C. Copy that section, and change it to match the DR-3010C.
> In your new section, also add this:
>
> s->invert_tly = 1;
>
> Then recompile and reinstall. Hopefully you will be able to scan.
>
> allan
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Milko Simeonov
> <msimeonov at intepro-bg.com> wrote:
>> OK, I've installed them back, they were sane-backends ,
>> sane-backends-autoconfig, hplip, hplip-sane and simple-scan .
>>
>> "scanimage -L" returns:
>> device `canon_dr:libusb:002:020' is a CANON DR-3010C scanner
>>
>> Milko
>>
>>
>>>>> "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> 11/26/12 4:08 PM >>>
>>
>> You probably should not un-install all the factory sane packages, as
>> that will remove frontend programs, and udev rules too. Generally, I
>> build sane-backends to overwrite the factory install.
>>
>> What is the output of scanimage -L when run as root?
>>
>> allan
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Milko Simeonov
>> <msimeonov at intepro-bg.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Allan,
>>>
>>> OK, I've uninstalled all sane-related packages that came with the distro
>>> and
>>> then I did (as root):
>>>
>>> git clone git://git.debian.org/sane/sane-backends.git
>>>
>>> ./configure --enable-libusb_1_0
>>>
>>> make
>>>
>>> make install
>>>
>>> All went fine.
>>>
>>> "scanimage -V" now returns:
>>>
>>> scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.24git; backend version 1.0.24
>>>
>>> "scanimage -T" returned:
>>> Created directory: /var/lib/net-snmp/mib_indexes
>>> scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument
>>>
>>> "sane-find-scanner" returned:
>>> # sane-find-scanner will now attempt to detect your scanner. If the
>>> # result is different from what you expected, first make sure your
>>> # scanner is powered up and properly connected to your computer.
>>>
>>> # No SCSI scanners found. If you expected something different, make sure
>>> that
>>> # you have loaded a kernel SCSI driver for your SCSI adapter.
>>>
>>> could not fetch string descriptor: Pipe error
>>> could not fetch string descriptor: Pipe error
>>> # No USB scanners found. If you expected something different, make sure
>>> that
>>> # you have loaded a kernel driver for your USB host controller and have
>>> setup
>>> # the USB system correctly. See man sane-usb for details.
>>>
>>> # Not checking for parallel port scanners.
>>>
>>> # Most Scanners connected to the parallel port or other proprietary ports
>>> # can't be detected by this program.
>>>
>>> What should I do next?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Milko
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> "m. allan noah" <kitno455 at gmail.com> 11/26/12 3:13 PM >>>
>>>
>>> Yes, this scanner requires code changes, and has had only minimal
>>> testing. Are you able to download and compile a sane-backends
>>> development snapshot from here:
>>>
>>> http://www.sane-project.org/source.html
>>>
>>> If so, we can make some minor changes to the code, and at least get
>>> some scans. It is possible that more changes will be required.
>>>
>>> allan
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Milko Simeonov
>>> <msimeonov at intepro-bg.com> wrote:
>>>> We have few USB scanners Canon DR-3010C which for some reason do not
>>>> work
>>>> under linux (openSUSE12.1, sled11sp2).
>>>>
>>>> lsusb returns:
>>>> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
>>>> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
>>>> Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
>>>> Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
>>>> Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
>>>> Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
>>>> Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
>>>> Bus 002 Device 002: ID 1083:161d Canon Electronics, Inc.
>>>>
>>>> sane-find-scanner returns:
>>>> found USB scanner (vendor=0x1083, product=0x161d) at libusb:002:002
>>>>
>>>> In /var/log/messages you can see:
>>>> Nov 26 14:49:20 sc02 kernel: [ 203.108275] usb 2-2: new high-speed USB
>>>> device number 2 using ehci_hcd
>>>> Nov 26 14:49:20 sc02 kernel: [ 203.243106] usb 2-2: New USB device
>>>> found,
>>>> idVendor=1083, idProduct=161d
>>>> Nov 26 14:49:20 sc02 kernel: [ 203.243117] usb 2-2: New USB device
>>>> strings:
>>>> Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0
>>>> Nov 26 14:49:20 sc02 kernel: [ 203.243124] usb 2-2: Product: CANON
>>>> DR-3010C
>>>> Nov 26 14:49:20 sc02 kernel: [ 203.243130] usb 2-2: Manufacturer: CANON
>>>>
>>>> So all looks fine, however if I open Yast->Scanner, select the scanner
>>>> driver and do "Test", I get:
>>>> Test with 'scanimage -d canon_dr:libusb:002:002 -v' failed.
>>>> The results are:
>>>> scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument
>>>>
>>>> In /etc/sane.d/canon_dr.conf you can see the following lines:
>>>> # DR-3010C
>>>> usb 0x1083 0x161d
>>>>
>>>> scanimage -V returns:
>>>> scanimage (sane-backends) 1.0.22; backend version 1.0.22
>>>>
>>>> rpm -qa | grep sane returns:
>>>> sane-backends-1.0.22-15.4.1.x86_64
>>>> xsane-0.998-8.1.2.x86_64
>>>> hplip-sane-3.11.10-3.1.2.x86_64
>>>> sane-backends-autoconfig-1.0.22-15.4.1.x86_64
>>>> sane-backends-devel-1.0.22-15.4.1.x86_64
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas anyone?
>>>>
>>>> Milko
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>>>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
>>>> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
>>>> to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
>
--
"The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20121126/ba62dcb1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the sane-devel
mailing list