[sane-devel] Canonscan N 650U LIDE Scanner does not scan but makes terrible noise

Andrea Vai andrea.vai at unipv.it
Mon Sep 9 21:33:43 UTC 2013


About the terrible noise... Gerhard (or others), do you need any more
testing from Winni and me? At the moment, a value of 0.76 for
dMaxMotorSpeed seems to be fine for both of us.

Winni, if you still have problems running sane as a non-privileged user,
try to read here:

http://www.sane-project.org/README.linux

and also
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1565846&page=2&s=736558689cd343dc4c4af0d3cabe7a4e(last
post)

and here: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/hardy/man5/sane-usb.5.html(LIBUSB
section)

and also, maybe, here:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ScanningHowTo#Permission_Issues

or simply among here ;-) :
http://www.google.it/#q=xsane+works+only+root+ubuntu+12.04

Best regards,
Andrea

2013/9/3 Winni <"windose"@kabelmail.de>

> Hi,
>
> with the help of Andrea Vai I was able to modify the file
> plustek-usbdevs.c @ line 2064 entering 0.76 for dMaxMotorSpeed.
>
> After that Andrea Vai showed me via Email recompiling
> sane-backends-git20130901
>
> Only recompiling did not work, so we had to rename and modify the symbolic
> links in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane from
>
> libsane-plustek.so -> /usr/lib/sane/libsane-plustek.**so.1.0.22
> libsane-plustek.so.1 -> /usr/lib/sane/libsane-plustek.**so.1.0.22
>
> to
>
> libsane-plustek.so -> /usr/lib/sane/libsane-plustek.**so.1.0.24
> libsane-plustek.so.1 -> /usr/lib/sane/libsane-plustek.**so.1.0.24
>
> output scanimage -L
>
> [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of plustek to 5.
> [plustek] Plustek backend V0.52-11, part of sane-backends 1.0.24git
> [plustek] Retrieving all supported and conntected devices
> [plustek] Available and supported devices:
> [plustek] Device: >libusb:006:002< - 0x04a9x0x2206
> [plustek] usbDev_open(auto,) - 0xbcae70
> [plustek] Vendor ID=0x04A9, Product ID=0x2206
> [plustek] usbio_DetectLM983x
> [plustek] usbio_DetectLM983x: found LM9832/3
> [plustek] Detected vendor & product ID: 0x04A9-0x2206
> [plustek] Device description for >0x04A9-0x2206< found.
> [plustek] usb_initDev(38,0x04a9,-1)
> [plustek] Device WAF  : 0x00004002
> [plustek] Transferrate: 1000000 Bytes/s
> [plustek] Device Flags: 0x00000000
> [plustek] Vendor adjusted to: >Canon<
> [plustek] LAMP-STATUS: 0x00000000 (off)
> [plustek] RESETTING REGISTERS(-1) - 0x80
> [plustek] MISC I/O after RESET: 0x66, 0x16, 0x91
> [plustek] Calibration file-names set to:
> [plustek] >/root/.sane/Canon_CanoScan_**N650U_N656U-coarse.cal<
> [plustek] >/root/.sane/Canon_CanoScan_**N650U_N656U-fine.cal<
> [plustek] usb_SetScanParameters()
> [plustek] usb_GetMCLKDivider()
> [plustek] usb_GetMCLKDiv()
> [plustek] * PhyBytes   = 6
> [plustek] * PhyLines   = 4
> [plustek] * TotalBytes = 24
> [plustek] * Scansteps=72 (9*1200/150)
> [plustek] usb_SetScanParameters() done.
> [plustek] usbDev_getCaps()
> [plustek] Scanner information:
> [plustek] Vendor : Canon
> [plustek] Model  : CanoScan N650U/N656U
> [plustek] Flags  : 0x00000000
> [plustek] drvclose()
> [plustek] usbDev_stopScan()
> [plustek] usbDev_ScanEnd(), start=0, park=0
> [plustek] usbDev_close()
> device `v4l:/dev/video0' is a Noname WebCam SCB-0320N virtual device
> device `plustek:libusb:006:002' is a Canon CanoScan N650U/N656U flatbed
> scanner
> [plustek] Shutdown called (dev->fd=-1, libusb:006:002)
> [plustek] Waiting for scanner-ready...
> [plustek] Switching lamp off...
> [plustek] LAMP-STATUS: 0x00000000 (off)
> [plustek] LAMP-STATUS: 0x00000000 (off)
> [plustek] Lamp-Timer stopped
>
>
> BUT (!) with KanotixDFx86_64 Distro I can only start the GUI Frontend as
> root with [ALT f2] kdesu XSane
>
> then I get a dialogue-box which tells me in German ( I translate)
>
> #Warning
> #You try to execute XSane as ROOT. This is really DANGEROUS!
> #Don't send any error messages if you get problems when executing XSane
> #as root. You are alone !
>
> Then I can choose between 'continue on your own risk' or 'cancel'
>
> Thus, I am alone I go on on my own risk and there you see.
>
> My Canonscan 650U scans as it should. I tried different resolutions.
> NO TERRIBLE SOUND !!! YES !!!
>
> I guess it has something to do with rights that I have to use Xsane and
> scanimage -L as root, because using the normal user the device will not be
> recognized. So if someone here has an idea it is highly appreciated.
>
> Until now thank you very much to Andrea Vai showing me how to recompile
> and tweak.
>
> Regards,
> Winni
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20130909/fe663d69/attachment.html>


More information about the sane-devel mailing list