[sane-devel] Canon MF8200C Series
Rolf Bensch
rolf at bensch-online.de
Sat Nov 15 14:15:38 UTC 2014
Hi Troels,
Do you still have the ADF issue? If so, please send me a log file again.
We just don't disable button support for scanners without some. I added
this to my todo list.
Cheers,
Rolf
Am 07.11.2014 um 11:21 schrieb Troels Thomsen:
>
> Hi,
>
> Update:
>
> Everything I can thing of works fine through ethernet also!
> :-)
>
> Another corner-case:
> Button controlled scan is not supported in the windows-driver, and does
> not work in XSane either.
> Is there a 'capabilities' protocol from XSane to the backend, such that
> if we mark 'button controlled scan' as not supported on this device, the
> XSane gui does not show this checkbox?
> Or we could just error the scan, if we get this request?
> Just a thought ...
>
> /Troels
>
>
> 2014-11-07 10:55 GMT+01:00 Troels Thomsen <troels.pil.thomsen at gmail.com
> <mailto:troels.pil.thomsen at gmail.com>>:
>
>
> MF8230 Scanner-driver is really good now through USB. (I'll test
> with ethernet another day.)
>
> I've found two corner-cases.
>
> 1)
> When choosing 3 copies from ADF in XSane, but putting 4 copies in
> the scanner (!) :
> - 3 pages are scanned correctly
> - All 4 pages goes through the ADF, and printer is waiting for
> something.
> - After 30 sec or so, it breaks with a beep and prints "error
> occured" in the display.
> No other intervention is required (you *can* break it on the scanner
> gui) - and scanner is not in bad-mode as we previously experienced.
> So I'm OK with this.
>
>
> 2)
> In xsane, if you choose two copies , from Flatbed (!) the scanner
> really scans twice at 300 dpi.
> At 600 dpi (and e.g. 75 dpi) it ends with EBUSY, see below, and a
> pop-up in XSane.
>
> Personally I'm OK with this, I don't know if we should do anything.
> I don't know if this is a valid use-case. If not - it could also be
> subject to input parameter validation in XSane or sane-backend.
> How does this work on other scanners?
>
> <cut>
> [pixma] IN T=723.027 len=14
> [pixma] 00000000:06 06 03 01 00 41 03 00 41 10 00 01 00 66
> [pixma]
> [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> [pixma] *iclass_finish_scan***** abort session *****
> [pixma] OUT T=723.027 len=10
> [pixma] 00000000:ef 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> [pixma]
> [pixma] IN T=723.037 len=2
> [pixma] 00000000:06 06
> [pixma]
> [pixma] pixma_read_image():completed
> [pixma] Reader task terminated
>
> (this is all perfectly normal - now the next scan starts)
>
> [pixma] Reader task started
> [pixma]
> [pixma] pixma_scan(): start
> [pixma] line_size=15360 image_size=107765760 channels=3 depth=8
> [pixma] dpi=600x600 offset=(0,0) dimension=5120x7016
> [pixma] [pixma] Reader task id=-1249522880 (threaded)
> gamma_table=0x95d087c source=0
> [pixma] threshold=127 threshold_curve=0
> [pixma] ADF page count: 0
> [pixma] Setting non-blocking mode
> [pixma] raw_width = 5120
> [pixma] OUT T=723.910 len=10
> [pixma] 00000000:f3 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 00
> [pixma]
> [pixma] IN T=723.917 len=14
> [pixma] 00000000:06 06 03 01 00 41 03 00 41 10 00 01 00 66
> [pixma]
> [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> [pixma] *iclass_scan***** start scanning *****
> [pixma] OUT T=723.917 len=10
> [pixma] 00000000:db 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> [pixma]
> [pixma] IN T=723.927 len=2
> [pixma] 00000000:14 14
> [pixma]
> [pixma] pixma_scan() failed EBUSY
> [pixma] Reader task terminated: EBUSY
> [pixma] read_image():reader task closed the pipe:0 bytes received,
> 107765760 bytes expected
> [pixma] pixma_close(): Canon i-SENSYS MF8200C Series
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2014-11-07 <tel:2014-11-07> 9:54 GMT+01:00 Troels Thomsen
> <troels.pil.thomsen at gmail.com <mailto:troels.pil.thomsen at gmail.com>>:
>
>
> Sorry for the delay.
> It turns out, that the MF8230 has max resolution 300dpi from ADF
> and 600 dpi from Platen Glass, see attached screenshots.
> So there is no work here - except possibly to error this
> condition and abort operation.
>
> I'll check again to see, if everything else seems to be working.
> I think it does.
>
> /Troels
>
>
>
> See attached
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2014-09-17 <tel:2014-09-17> 9:15 GMT+02:00 Rolf Bensch
> <rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>:
>
> Hi Troels,
>
> For my understanding: Can you do multiple scanimage scans
> without
> power-cycling the device between two single scans?
>
> Cheers,
> Rolf
>
>
> Am 11.09.2014 um 22:52 schrieb Troels Thomsen:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Attached is log of two pages scanned with adf at 600 dbp.
> Device is
> > freshly power-cycled before this trace.
> > Xsane hangs until I break it with Ctrl+C in the terminal.
> > From the look of the logfile, it seems like no real image
> data is
> > transmitted. Only the
> > OUT T=60.552 len=11
> > [pixma] 00000000:d4 60 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 06
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] IN T=60.569 len=8
> > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > sequence is seen.
> >
> >
> > Also attached is the xsane log for scanning with flatbed
> at 600 dpi.
> > Data is shown in window in xsane, but an error-box is
> displayed, and
> > logfile seems to end with a EBUSY.
> >
> > Oddly, imho, scanimage just ends like this:
> >
> >
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] IN T=17.647 len=7680
> > [pixma] 00000000:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ff ff ff
> > [pixma] 00000010:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ff ff ff
> > [pixma] 00000020:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ff ff ff
> > [pixma] 00000030:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ff ff ff
> > [pixma] 00000040:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ff ff ff
> > [pixma] 00000050:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ff ff ff
> > [pixma] 00000060:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ff ff ff
> > [pixma] 00000070:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ff ff ff
> > [pixma] ...
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] IN T=17.647 len=8
> > [pixma] 00000000:f1 f0 ee f1 ed ee eb e3
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] OUT T=17.647 len=11
> > [pixma] 00000000:d4 60 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 06
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] IN T=17.656 len=8
> > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 28 00 00 00 00 00
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] OUT T=17.678 len=10
> > [pixma] 00000000:f3 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 00
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] IN T=17.688 len=14
> > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 03 01 00 41 03 00 41 10 00 01 00 66
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> > [pixma] OUT T=17.688 len=10
> > [pixma] 00000000:f3 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 00
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] IN T=17.696 len=14
> > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 03 01 00 41 03 00 41 10 00 01 00 66
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> > [pixma] *iclass_finish_scan***** abort session *****
> > [pixma] OUT T=17.696 len=10
> > [pixma] 00000000:ef 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] IN T=17.706 len=2
> > [pixma] 00000000:06 06
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] pixma_read_image():completed
> > [pixma] Reader task terminated
> > [pixma] pixma_close(): Canon i-SENSYS MF8200C Series
> >
> > I.e. NO error when using scanimage, but EBUSY when using
> XSane !?!?
> >
> >
> >
> > /Troels
> >
> >
> > 2014-09-11 19:18 GMT+02:00 Rolf Bensch
> <rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
> > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>>:
> >
> > Hi Troels,
> >
> > Am 09.09.2014 um 23:11 schrieb Troels Thomsen:
> > > Hi Rolf
> > >
> > > patch new1 seems to work!
> > >
> > > regarding ADF its mixed:
> > > At 150 dpi it scans pages, but colors are a bit psycedelic. Bacground
> > > should be white.
> >
> > You need to do some gamma settings. It's easier to use xsane here.
> >
> > > At 600 dpi it fails, and scanner hangs.
> > >
> >
> > It seems that your scanner doesn't finish the scan correctly @ any
> > resolution. I saw an unsupported paper status.
> >
> > Please restart your scanner and test 600 dpi directly. And please try a
> > multi page ADF scan after you repowered your scanner.
> >
> > Please send new log files. Then I'll patch this next weekend.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rolf
> >
> > > /Troels
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2014-09-03 21:15 GMT+02:00 Rolf Bensch <rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>
> > > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>>>:
> > >
> > > Hi Troels,
> > >
> > > OK, based on recent git code I prepared a new patch.
> > >
> > > With this patch I revert last patch2 and try to fix scan end detection.
> > >
> > > If this patch is working for flatbed, please test ADF scanning.
> > >
> > > Please send me a log file from ADF scanning, whatever it's running or
> > > not. If ADF gets stuck, please send me an ADF log file from windows.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Rolf
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 31.08.2014 <tel:31.08.2014> <tel:31.08.2014
> <tel:31.08.2014>> <tel:31.08.2014 <tel:31.08.2014>
> > <tel:31.08.2014 <tel:31.08.2014>>> um 09:31 schrieb Troels Thomsen:
> > > >
> > > > I have done a lot of testing with scan areas of 5 by 5 milimeters, and
> > > > that gives a false picture of what works and what does not. (slightly
> > > > different behaviour on BJNP and USB)
> > > > Sorry
> > > >
> > > > Let's go back to usb and scanning large areas:
> > > >
> > > > Patch 1 (usb vid/pid) works, but scanner hangs in "scanning".
> > > >
> > > > Patch 2 (generation 1), makes scanning fail as seen in logfile of
> > > > previous post.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I've tested with git revision of ~ 1 august , and of today, and picture
> > > > is the same. Patch 2 makes it fail.
> > > >
> > > > Could it be that it's not a classic generation 1 or generation 2, but a
> > > > mix somehow?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > /Troels
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2014-08-30 12:55 GMT+02:00 Rolf Bensch <rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>
> > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>>
> > > > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>
> > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>>>>:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Troels,
> > > >
> > > > Am 30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014> <tel:30.08.2014
> <tel:30.08.2014>> <tel:30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014>
> > <tel:30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014>>> <tel:30.08.2014
> <tel:30.08.2014> <tel:30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014>>
> > > <tel:30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014> <tel:30.08.2014
> <tel:30.08.2014>>>> um 06:44 schrieb Troels
> > Thomsen:
> > > > > It seems that there is a problem with
> mf8230 usb scanning.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm pretty sure I did the testing with
> the patches I got,
> > > but now
> > > > when I
> > > > > pull from git, it fails.
> > > > > Was anything added/changed recently in
> pixma backend,
> > that could
> > > > > influence mf8230?
> > > >
> > > > I did a smarter implementation for setting
> the generation
> > > version = 1.
> > > > But it's working, as you can see in the
> log file.
> > > >
> > > > Are you sure that you disconnected the LAN
> interface while
> > > testing USB?
> > > > And can you scan via LAN only?
> > > >
> > > > If this doesn't help, please go back to
> the debugged Sane
> > > version and
> > > > patch the files again. Please send me a
> working log file.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Rolf
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
More information about the sane-devel
mailing list