[sane-devel] Canon MF8200C Series
Rolf Bensch
rolf at bensch-online.de
Mon Nov 17 09:31:20 UTC 2014
Hi Troels,
You're right. We shouldn't follow that path if this feature isn't
supported in the Windows driver.
Please try attached patch. This should disable 600dpi feature @ ADF.
The patches are neither online in my ppa nor in Sane's git repository.
I'll fix this after your feedback.
Cheers,
Rolf
Am 17.11.2014 um 08:39 schrieb Troels Thomsen:
>
> Well,
> ADF is funny in 600 dpi, but 600 dpi is not supported in windows driver,
> so I'm unable to make such a USB log, and I assume that we don't want to
> explore that path further?
>
> Another thing, are these MF8200 changes 'online' in your PPA?
>
> Again thx for all the effort!
>
> /Troels
>
>
> 2014-11-15 15:15 GMT+01:00 Rolf Bensch <rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>:
>
> Hi Troels,
>
> Do you still have the ADF issue? If so, please send me a log file again.
>
> We just don't disable button support for scanners without some. I added
> this to my todo list.
>
> Cheers,
> Rolf
>
>
> Am 07.11.2014 um 11:21 schrieb Troels Thomsen:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Update:
> >
> > Everything I can thing of works fine through ethernet also!
> > :-)
> >
> > Another corner-case:
> > Button controlled scan is not supported in the windows-driver, and does
> > not work in XSane either.
> > Is there a 'capabilities' protocol from XSane to the backend, such that
> > if we mark 'button controlled scan' as not supported on this device, the
> > XSane gui does not show this checkbox?
> > Or we could just error the scan, if we get this request?
> > Just a thought ...
> >
> > /Troels
> >
> >
> > 2014-11-07 10:55 GMT+01:00 Troels Thomsen <troels.pil.thomsen at gmail.com <mailto:troels.pil.thomsen at gmail.com>
> > <mailto:troels.pil.thomsen at gmail.com
> <mailto:troels.pil.thomsen at gmail.com>>>:
> >
> >
> > MF8230 Scanner-driver is really good now through USB. (I'll test
> > with ethernet another day.)
> >
> > I've found two corner-cases.
> >
> > 1)
> > When choosing 3 copies from ADF in XSane, but putting 4 copies in
> > the scanner (!) :
> > - 3 pages are scanned correctly
> > - All 4 pages goes through the ADF, and printer is waiting for
> > something.
> > - After 30 sec or so, it breaks with a beep and prints "error
> > occured" in the display.
> > No other intervention is required (you *can* break it on the
> scanner
> > gui) - and scanner is not in bad-mode as we previously
> experienced.
> > So I'm OK with this.
> >
> >
> > 2)
> > In xsane, if you choose two copies , from Flatbed (!) the scanner
> > really scans twice at 300 dpi.
> > At 600 dpi (and e.g. 75 dpi) it ends with EBUSY, see below, and a
> > pop-up in XSane.
> >
> > Personally I'm OK with this, I don't know if we should do
> anything.
> > I don't know if this is a valid use-case. If not - it could
> also be
> > subject to input parameter validation in XSane or sane-backend.
> > How does this work on other scanners?
> >
> > <cut>
> > [pixma] IN T=723.027 len=14
> > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 03 01 00 41 03 00 41 10 00 01 00 66
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> > [pixma] *iclass_finish_scan***** abort session *****
> > [pixma] OUT T=723.027 len=10
> > [pixma] 00000000:ef 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] IN T=723.037 len=2
> > [pixma] 00000000:06 06
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] pixma_read_image():completed
> > [pixma] Reader task terminated
> >
> > (this is all perfectly normal - now the next scan starts)
> >
> > [pixma] Reader task started
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] pixma_scan(): start
> > [pixma] line_size=15360 image_size=107765760 channels=3 depth=8
> > [pixma] dpi=600x600 offset=(0,0) dimension=5120x7016
> > [pixma] [pixma] Reader task id=-1249522880 (threaded)
> > gamma_table=0x95d087c source=0
> > [pixma] threshold=127 threshold_curve=0
> > [pixma] ADF page count: 0
> > [pixma] Setting non-blocking mode
> > [pixma] raw_width = 5120
> > [pixma] OUT T=723.910 len=10
> > [pixma] 00000000:f3 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 00
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] IN T=723.917 len=14
> > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 03 01 00 41 03 00 41 10 00 01 00 66
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> > [pixma] *iclass_scan***** start scanning *****
> > [pixma] OUT T=723.917 len=10
> > [pixma] 00000000:db 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] IN T=723.927 len=2
> > [pixma] 00000000:14 14
> > [pixma]
> > [pixma] pixma_scan() failed EBUSY
> > [pixma] Reader task terminated: EBUSY
> > [pixma] read_image():reader task closed the pipe:0 bytes received,
> > 107765760 bytes expected
> > [pixma] pixma_close(): Canon i-SENSYS MF8200C Series
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2014-11-07 <tel:2014-11-07> <tel:2014-11-07 <tel:2014-11-07>>
> 9:54 GMT+01:00 Troels Thomsen
> > <troels.pil.thomsen at gmail.com
> <mailto:troels.pil.thomsen at gmail.com>
> <mailto:troels.pil.thomsen at gmail.com
> <mailto:troels.pil.thomsen at gmail.com>>>:
> >
> >
> > Sorry for the delay.
> > It turns out, that the MF8230 has max resolution 300dpi from ADF
> > and 600 dpi from Platen Glass, see attached screenshots.
> > So there is no work here - except possibly to error this
> > condition and abort operation.
> >
> > I'll check again to see, if everything else seems to be working.
> > I think it does.
> >
> > /Troels
> >
> >
> >
> > See attached
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2014-09-17 <tel:2014-09-17> <tel:2014-09-17
> <tel:2014-09-17>> 9:15 GMT+02:00 Rolf Bensch
> > <rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>>:
> >
> > Hi Troels,
> >
> > For my understanding: Can you do multiple scanimage scans
> > without
> > power-cycling the device between two single scans?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rolf
> >
> >
> > Am 11.09.2014 um 22:52 schrieb Troels Thomsen:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Attached is log of two pages scanned with adf at 600
> dbp.
> > Device is
> > > freshly power-cycled before this trace.
> > > Xsane hangs until I break it with Ctrl+C in the
> terminal.
> > > From the look of the logfile, it seems like no real
> image
> > data is
> > > transmitted. Only the
> > > OUT T=60.552 len=11
> > > [pixma] 00000000:d4 60 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 06
> > > [pixma]
> > > [pixma] IN T=60.569 len=8
> > > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > > sequence is seen.
> > >
> > >
> > > Also attached is the xsane log for scanning with flatbed
> > at 600 dpi.
> > > Data is shown in window in xsane, but an error-box is
> > displayed, and
> > > logfile seems to end with a EBUSY.
> > >
> > > Oddly, imho, scanimage just ends like this:
> > >
> > >
> > > [pixma]
> > > [pixma] IN T=17.647 len=7680
> > > [pixma] 00000000:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ff ff
> > ff ff ff
> > > [pixma] 00000010:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ff ff
> > ff ff ff
> > > [pixma] 00000020:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ff ff
> > ff ff ff
> > > [pixma] 00000030:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ff ff
> > ff ff ff
> > > [pixma] 00000040:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ff ff
> > ff ff ff
> > > [pixma] 00000050:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ff ff
> > ff ff ff
> > > [pixma] 00000060:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ff ff
> > ff ff ff
> > > [pixma] 00000070:ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> ff ff
> > ff ff ff
> > > [pixma] ...
> > > [pixma]
> > > [pixma] IN T=17.647 len=8
> > > [pixma] 00000000:f1 f0 ee f1 ed ee eb e3
> > > [pixma]
> > > [pixma] OUT T=17.647 len=11
> > > [pixma] 00000000:d4 60 00 00 00 00 00 00 04 00 06
> > > [pixma]
> > > [pixma] IN T=17.656 len=8
> > > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 28 00 00 00 00 00
> > > [pixma]
> > > [pixma] OUT T=17.678 len=10
> > > [pixma] 00000000:f3 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 00
> > > [pixma]
> > > [pixma] IN T=17.688 len=14
> > > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 03 01 00 41 03 00 41 10 00
> 01 00 66
> > > [pixma]
> > > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> > > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> > > [pixma] OUT T=17.688 len=10
> > > [pixma] 00000000:f3 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 00
> > > [pixma]
> > > [pixma] IN T=17.696 len=14
> > > [pixma] 00000000:06 06 03 01 00 41 03 00 41 10 00
> 01 00 66
> > > [pixma]
> > > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> > > [pixma] Current status: paper=1 cal=0 lamp=16
> > > [pixma] *iclass_finish_scan***** abort session *****
> > > [pixma] OUT T=17.696 len=10
> > > [pixma] 00000000:ef 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > > [pixma]
> > > [pixma] IN T=17.706 len=2
> > > [pixma] 00000000:06 06
> > > [pixma]
> > > [pixma] pixma_read_image():completed
> > > [pixma] Reader task terminated
> > > [pixma] pixma_close(): Canon i-SENSYS MF8200C Series
> > >
> > > I.e. NO error when using scanimage, but EBUSY when using
> > XSane !?!?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > /Troels
> > >
> > >
> > > 2014-09-11 19:18 GMT+02:00 Rolf Bensch
> > <rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>
> > > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
> > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>>>:
> > >
> > > Hi Troels,
> > >
> > > Am 09.09.2014 um 23:11 schrieb Troels Thomsen:
> > > > Hi Rolf
> > > >
> > > > patch new1 seems to work!
> > > >
> > > > regarding ADF its mixed:
> > > > At 150 dpi it scans pages, but colors are a bit psycedelic. Bacground
> > > > should be white.
> > >
> > > You need to do some gamma settings. It's easier to use xsane here.
> > >
> > > > At 600 dpi it fails, and scanner hangs.
> > > >
> > >
> > > It seems that your scanner doesn't finish the scan correctly @ any
> > > resolution. I saw an unsupported paper status.
> > >
> > > Please restart your scanner and test 600 dpi directly. And please try a
> > > multi page ADF scan after you repowered your scanner.
> > >
> > > Please send new log files. Then I'll patch this next weekend.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Rolf
> > >
> > > > /Troels
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2014-09-03 21:15 GMT+02:00 Rolf Bensch <rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>
> > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>>
> > > > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>
> > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>>>>:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Troels,
> > > >
> > > > OK, based on recent git code I prepared a new patch.
> > > >
> > > > With this patch I revert last patch2 and try to fix scan end detection.
> > > >
> > > > If this patch is working for flatbed, please test ADF scanning.
> > > >
> > > > Please send me a log file from ADF scanning, whatever it's running or
> > > > not. If ADF gets stuck, please send me an ADF log file from windows.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Rolf
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Am 31.08.2014 <tel:31.08.2014> <tel:31.08.2014 <tel:31.08.2014>>
> <tel:31.08.2014 <tel:31.08.2014>
> > <tel:31.08.2014 <tel:31.08.2014>>> <tel:31.08.2014
> <tel:31.08.2014> <tel:31.08.2014 <tel:31.08.2014>>
> > > <tel:31.08.2014 <tel:31.08.2014> <tel:31.08.2014
> <tel:31.08.2014>>>> um 09:31 schrieb Troels Thomsen:
> > > > >
> > > > > I have done a lot of testing with scan
> areas of 5 by 5 milimeters, and
> > > > > that gives a false picture of what works
> and what does not. (slightly
> > > > > different behaviour on BJNP and USB)
> > > > > Sorry
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's go back to usb and scanning large
> areas:
> > > > >
> > > > > Patch 1 (usb vid/pid) works, but scanner
> hangs in "scanning".
> > > > >
> > > > > Patch 2 (generation 1), makes scanning
> fail as seen in logfile of
> > > > > previous post.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I've tested with git revision of ~ 1
> august , and of today, and picture
> > > > > is the same. Patch 2 makes it fail.
> > > > >
> > > > > Could it be that it's not a classic
> generation 1 or generation 2, but a
> > > > > mix somehow?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > /Troels
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2014-08-30 12:55 GMT+02:00 Rolf Bensch
> <rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>
> > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>>
> > > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>
> > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>>>
> > > > > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>
> > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>>
> > > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>
> > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>
> > <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de
> <mailto:rolf at bensch-online.de>>>>>>:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Troels,
> > > > >
> > > > > Am 30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014>
> <tel:30.08.2014
> > <tel:30.08.2014>> <tel:30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014>
> > > <tel:30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014>>> <tel:30.08.2014
> > <tel:30.08.2014> <tel:30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014>>
> > > > <tel:30.08.2014 <tel:30.08.2014>
> <tel:30.08.2014
> > <tel:30.08.2014>>>> um 06:44 schrieb Troels
> > > Thomsen:
> > > > > > It seems that there is a problem with
> > mf8230 usb scanning.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm pretty sure I did the testing with
> > the patches I got,
> > > > but now
> > > > > when I
> > > > > > pull from git, it fails.
> > > > > > Was anything added/changed recently in
> > pixma backend,
> > > that could
> > > > > > influence mf8230?
> > > > >
> > > > > I did a smarter implementation for
> setting
> > the generation
> > > > version = 1.
> > > > > But it's working, as you can see in the
> > log file.
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you sure that you disconnected
> the LAN
> > interface while
> > > > testing USB?
> > > > > And can you scan via LAN only?
> > > > >
> > > > > If this doesn't help, please go back to
> > the debugged Sane
> > > > version and
> > > > > patch the files again. Please send me a
> > working log file.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Rolf
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
--- ./pixma_imageclass.c 2014-11-17 10:24:46.494773022 +0100
+++ ../sane-backends/backend/pixma_imageclass.c 2014-11-17 10:24:53.790140384 +0100
@@ -757,44 +757,45 @@
iclass_get_status
};
-#define DEV(name, model, pid, dpi, w, h, cap) { \
+#define DEV(name, model, pid, dpi, adftpu_max_dpi, w, h, cap) { \
name, /* name */ \
model, /* model */ \
0x04a9, pid, /* vid pid */ \
1, /* iface */ \
&pixma_iclass_ops, /* ops */ \
dpi, dpi, /* xdpi, ydpi */ \
- 0, 0, /* adftpu_min_dpi & adftpu_max_dpi not used in this subdriver */ \
+ 0, /* adftpu_min_dpi not used in this subdriver */ \
+ adftpu_max_dpi, /* adftpu_max_dpi */ \
0, 0, /* tpuir_min_dpi & tpuir_max_dpi not used in this subdriver */ \
w, h, /* width, height */ \
PIXMA_CAP_GRAY|PIXMA_CAP_EVENTS|cap \
}
const pixma_config_t pixma_iclass_devices[] = {
- DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF4270", "MF4270", MF4200_PID, 600, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
- DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF4150", "MF4100", MF4100_PID, 600, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
- DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF4690", "MF4690", MF4600_PID, 600, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
- DEV ("Canon imageCLASS D420", "D420", D420_PID, 600, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
- DEV ("Canon imageCLASS D480", "D480", D480_PID, 600, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
- DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF4360", "MF4360", MF4360_PID, 600, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
- DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF4320", "MF4320", MF4320_PID, 600, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
- DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF4010", "MF4010", MF4010_PID, 600, 640, 877, 0),
- DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF3240", "MF3240", MF3200_PID, 600, 640, 877, 0),
- DEV ("Canon imageClass MF6500", "MF6500", MF6500_PID, 600, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
- DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF4410", "MF4410", MF4410_PID, 600, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
- DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF4500 Series", "MF4500", MF4500_PID, 600, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
- DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF3010", "MF3010", MF3010_PID, 600, 640, 877, 0),
- DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF4700 Series", "MF4700", MF4700_PID, 600, 640, 1050, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
- DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF4800 Series", "MF4800", MF4800_PID, 600, 640, 1050, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
- DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF4570dw", "MF4570dw", MF4570_PID, 600, 640, 877, 0),
- DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF8200C Series", "MF8200C", MF8200_PID, 600, 640, 1050, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
+ DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF4270", "MF4270", MF4200_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
+ DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF4150", "MF4100", MF4100_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
+ DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF4690", "MF4690", MF4600_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
+ DEV ("Canon imageCLASS D420", "D420", D420_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
+ DEV ("Canon imageCLASS D480", "D480", D480_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
+ DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF4360", "MF4360", MF4360_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
+ DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF4320", "MF4320", MF4320_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
+ DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF4010", "MF4010", MF4010_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, 0),
+ DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF3240", "MF3240", MF3200_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, 0),
+ DEV ("Canon imageClass MF6500", "MF6500", MF6500_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
+ DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF4410", "MF4410", MF4410_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
+ DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF4500 Series", "MF4500", MF4500_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
+ DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF3010", "MF3010", MF3010_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, 0),
+ DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF4700 Series", "MF4700", MF4700_PID, 600, 0, 640, 1050, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
+ DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF4800 Series", "MF4800", MF4800_PID, 600, 0, 640, 1050, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
+ DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF4570dw", "MF4570dw", MF4570_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, 0),
+ DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF8200C Series", "MF8200C", MF8200_PID, 600, 300, 640, 1050, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
/* FIXME: the following capabilities all need updating/verifying */
- DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF5630", "MF5630", MF5630_PID, 600, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
- DEV ("Canon laserBase MF5650", "MF5650", MF5650_PID, 600, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
- DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF8170c", "MF8170c", MF8100_PID, 600, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
- DEV ("Canon imageClass MF8030", "MF8030", MF8030_PID, 600, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
- DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF5880dn", "MF5880", MF5880_PID, 600, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
- DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF6680dn", "MF6680", MF6680_PID, 600, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
- DEV ("Canon imageRUNNER 1133", "iR1133", IR1133_PID, 600, 637, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
- DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF8500C Series", "MF8500C", MF8500_PID, 600, 640, 1050, PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
- DEV (NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
+ DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF5630", "MF5630", MF5630_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
+ DEV ("Canon laserBase MF5650", "MF5650", MF5650_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
+ DEV ("Canon imageCLASS MF8170c", "MF8170c", MF8100_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
+ DEV ("Canon imageClass MF8030", "MF8030", MF8030_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADF),
+ DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF5880dn", "MF5880", MF5880_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
+ DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF6680dn", "MF6680", MF6680_PID, 600, 0, 640, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
+ DEV ("Canon imageRUNNER 1133", "iR1133", IR1133_PID, 600, 0, 637, 877, PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
+ DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF8500C Series", "MF8500C", MF8500_PID, 600, 0, 640, 1050, PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
+ DEV (NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
};
More information about the sane-devel
mailing list