[sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
tx
gtux at gimpchat.com
Fri Oct 17 06:09:02 UTC 2014
I forgot to include the new patch. Perhaps someone could look it over to
ensure I got it right.
*** pixma_imageclass.c 2014-10-16 08:35:04.904198000 -0400
--- pixma_imageclass-patched.c 2014-10-17 01:21:15.669433000 -0400
***************
*** 96,101 ****
--- 96,102 ----
#define MF8030_PID 0x2707
#define IR1133_PID 0x2742
#define MF8500_PID 0x277a
+ #define D530_PID 0x2775
enum iclass_state_t
***************
*** 414,421 ****
return error;
if (s->param->source == PIXMA_SOURCE_ADF && !has_paper (s))
return PIXMA_ENO_PAPER;
! /* activate only seen for generation 1 scanners */
! if (mf->generation == 1)
{
if (error >= 0)
error = activate (s, 0);
--- 415,423 ----
return error;
if (s->param->source == PIXMA_SOURCE_ADF && !has_paper (s))
return PIXMA_ENO_PAPER;
! /* activate only seen for generation 1 scanners
! * but not for D530 */
! if (mf->generation == 1 && s->cfg->pid != D530_PID)
{
if (error >= 0)
error = activate (s, 0);
***************
*** 474,482 ****
/* set generation = 2 for new multifunctionals
* some new scanners use generation 1 protocol */
! mf->generation = (s->cfg->pid >= MF8030_PID &&
! s->cfg->pid != MF8200_PID &&
! s->cfg->pid != MF8500_PID) ? 2 : 1;
PDBG (pixma_dbg (3, "*iclass_open***** This is a generation %d
scanner. *****\n", mf->generation));
PDBG (pixma_dbg (3, "Trying to clear the interrupt buffer...\n"));
--- 476,487 ----
/* set generation = 2 for new multifunctionals
* some new scanners use generation 1 protocol */
! /* set generation = 2 for new multifunctionals
! * except D530 is a generation 1 scanner */
! mf->generation = (s->cfg->pid >= MF8030_PID &&
! s->cfg->pid != MF8200_PID &&
! s->cfg->pid != MF8500_PID &&
! s->cfg->pid != D530_PID) ? 2 : 1;
PDBG (pixma_dbg (3, "*iclass_open***** This is a generation %d
scanner. *****\n", mf->generation));
PDBG (pixma_dbg (3, "Trying to clear the interrupt buffer...\n"));
***************
*** 570,575 ****
--- 575,582 ----
if (error >= 0)
error = send_scan_param (s);
if (error >= 0)
+ error = query_status (s);
+ if (error >= 0)
error = request_image_block (s, 0, &ignore, &ignore2, &ignore,
&ignore2);
if (error < 0)
{
***************
*** 794,798 ****
--- 801,806 ----
DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF6680dn", "MF6680", MF6680_PID, 600, 640, 877,
PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
DEV ("Canon imageRUNNER 1133", "iR1133", IR1133_PID, 600, 637, 877,
PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
DEV ("Canon i-SENSYS MF8500C Series", "MF8500C", MF8500_PID, 600, 640,
1050, PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
+ DEV ("Canon imageCLASS D530", "D530", D530_PID, 600, 640, 877, 0),
DEV (NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
};
Thanks!
~gtux
On Fri, October 17, 2014 2:05 am, tx wrote:
> I have made further progress and believe I was able to manually apply the
> patch provided by Rolf to the current version of pixma_imageclass.c from
> git. After applying the patch, I am now able to see the device as a
> normal user via scanimage -L
>
> device `v4l:/dev/video1' is a Noname Hauppauge WinTV-HVR1800 virtual
> device device `v4l:/dev/video0' is a Noname Hauppauge WinTV-HVR1800
> virtual device device `pixma:04A92775' is a CANON Canon imageCLASS D530
> multi-function peripheral
>
> The first two devices are my Hauppauge HDTV ATSC card. Before applying
> the patch, I did not see the pixma:04A92775 device. I also copied the rule
> to /etc/udev/rules.d/, as outlined in the January post.
>
>
> # Canon imageCLASS D530
> ATTRS{idVendor}=="04a9", ATTRS{idProduct}=="2775", MODE="0664",
> GROUP="scanner", ENV{libsane_matched}="yes"
>
>
> However, this is as far as I have been able to get. If I run the test as
> a regular user, I get the "invalid argument" message. $ scanimage >
> test.pnm scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument
>
>
> or when including the device name, I am denied permissions. $ scanimage
> --device-name=pixma:04A92775 > test.prn
> scanimage: open of device pixma:04A92775 failed: Access to resource has
> been denied
>
> If I run the test as root, I get this..
> [root]# scanimage > test.prn
> scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument
>
>
> [root]# scanimage --device-name=pixma:04A92775 > test.prn
> scanimage: open of device pixma:04A92775 failed: Invalid argument
>
>
> I'm not sure where to go from here. Any assistance would be appreciated.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Thu, October 16, 2014 9:33 am, tx wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a Canon D530 Printer/Copy/Scanner and would really like to be
>> able to scan in Linux via sane. I'm currently using Fedora 20_x86 and
>> would be happy to volunteer for testing.
>>
>> (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon Inc], product=0x2775 [D530/D560]) at
>> libusb:002:008
>>
>>
>>
>> I grabbed the latest backend from git and applied this patch from
>> January.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2014-January/032066
>> .h
>> tml
>>
>> I assume the patch is outdated because I couldn't apply it to the
>> source file: pixma_imageclass.c.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is there a new patch available that I could try.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>> gtux
>>
>>
>> --
>> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
>> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
>> to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pixma_imageclass.c.patch4-d530
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2763 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20141017/87b1ae01/attachment-0001.obj>
More information about the sane-devel
mailing list