andyjpb at ashurst.eu.org
Mon Jan 25 16:36:26 GMT 2021
> I'm looking to get into scanning in the GNU/Linux world - I do
> not yet own a scanner. I know the SANE compatibility matrix
> exists , but I am hoping for some anecdotal recommendations.
> What scanners are people using and how happy are you with your
> scanner and your SANE front-end?
I have a Fujitsu ScanSnap iX500 and I'm very please with it.
> Also, I read a short blog post  about the author's scanner
> yielding different results under Windows and GNU/Linux. The
> author claims that the Windows driver can have better color
> accuracy. Does anyone have any commentary about such notions?
>  https://www.digitaltidying.com/dont-use-linux-to-scan-photographs/
I can't speak to this issue particularly, but the iX500 has colour issues
of its own.
I scan to pnm files with the included "scanimage" backend.
I then have my own toolchain that does the things I want to these files.
AFAICT, the data that ends up in the pnm files is the raw data from the
scanning head. i.e. its. plain RGB intensity values.
On the one hand, this is great because getting the raw data leaves me with
the most options.
On the other hand, it's a pain.
These files look terrible on Linux. Weirdly, the exact same files look fine
If I correct the files with pnmgamma, applying the sRGB or CIE profiles
then they look fine.
The scanner is a duplex unit and therefore has a scanning head and a bright
light on both sides of the page. This means that the exact colour
reproduction varies greatly with the thickness of the paper.
I have a stock set of colour curves that I use to correct things to how I
...but in general, all colour is lies, and faithful or accurate conversion
between CMYK (used for print) and RGB (used for screen) is particularly
Perhaps if you use one of the more featureful SANE frontends then it does a
lot of this stuff for you, but I was keen to make my own toolchain.
When I first got the scanner I read this guide:
http://www.samhallas.co.uk/repository/scanning.htm and learnt a lot.
Getting passable scans from any toolkit (Windows or Linux) is fairly
straightforward. Getting "stunning" scans is always an art, similar to
digital photo manipulation.
What you'll need to go alongside SANE will depend a lot on what you want to
use the scanner for.
For example, documents might benefit from OCR (optical character
recognition). Photos might benefit from a full Photoshop style package.
Let us know some more of your requirements, such as use case, budget, etc,
and I'll try to offer some more anecdotes (if I have any).
andyjpb at ashurst.eu.org
More information about the sane-devel