[DSE-Dev] Bug#660345: fixed in policycoreutils 2.1.10-5

Laurent Bigonville bigon at debian.org
Thu Mar 22 10:08:53 UTC 2012


Le Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:57:08 +0100,
Paul Menzel <pm.debian at googlemail.com> a écrit :

Hi,

> Am Dienstag, den 20.03.2012, 19:02 +0000 schrieb Laurent Bigonville:
> 
> I still get this error.
> 
>         $ LANG=C sudo aptitude safe-upgrade
>         [sudo] password for paul: 
>         Resolving dependencies...                
>         The following partially installed packages will be configured:
>           policycoreutils 
>         No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
>         0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 12
> not upgraded. Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will
> be used. Setting up policycoreutils (2.1.10-5) ...
>         Sandbox disabled, edit /etc/default/sandbox to enable it
>         update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/policycoreutils exists during rc.d
> purge (use -f to force) dpkg: error processing policycoreutils
> (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned
> error exit status 1 configured to not write apport reports
>                                               Errors were encountered
> while processing: policycoreutils
>         E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>         A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:
>         Setting up policycoreutils (2.1.10-5) ...
>         Sandbox disabled, edit /etc/default/sandbox to enable it
>         update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/policycoreutils exists during rc.d
> purge (use -f to force) dpkg: error processing policycoreutils
> (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned
> error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing:
>          policycoreutils

Was the package correctly configured before you've try to update it?
I've the feeling when looking at the above output, that the old package
was half-installed. But this definitely looks like the script from the
old version of the package. I've just tried again and it's working for
me.

Cheers

Laurent Bigonville





More information about the SELinux-devel mailing list