[DSE-Dev] Bug#796693: Bug#796693: selinux-basics: Has init script in runlevel S but no matching service file

[Russell Coker]

On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:49:15 AM Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Package: selinux-basics
> Followup-For: Bug #796693
> 
> I'm planning to kill the selinux-basics LSB initscript entirely and
> remove all functionalities from the selinux-basic package. I'm planning
> to keep selinux-basics as just a metapackage (with maybe the scripts to
> easily enable selinux on debian).
> 
> I'll move the relabeling functions to the policycoreutils package and use
> the same logic that fedora is using (debian-selinux-autorelabel.service
> and debian-selinux-autorelabel-mark.service plus a
> debian-selinux-autorelabel LSB initscript).

Why are you planning to merge it with policycoreutils?  Is the functionality 
in question in policycoreutils upstream?  I don't have any real objection to 
such changes, but I would like to know what the benefits are.

If there's code we can copy from Fedora then that's great!

As an aside I uploaded a new version of selinux-basics ~6 hours ago to fix the 
umount issue.  For some reason my uploads seem to be taking ages to get 
processed.

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/