[Surfraw-devel] Bug#209155 and namespace issues

[Ian Beckwith]

Hi.

Kevin wrote:

> So, I guess, change it to a note.  Also, if you don't mind, can we also 
> put a copy of the relevant lines under /usr/share/doc someplace (like 
> in the README or so) ?

OK, done that. I've also lowered the priority to medium, as
it will now get mailed to them if they don't see it.

I've added a paragraph to README explaining the surfraw-update-path
stuff.

> I think you are supposed to use DESTDIR, anyway.  In any case, I think 
> we should upload a version based on the NAMESPACE branch, and basically 
> make that HEAD from now on.  Conveniently, that gets rid of any 
> problems with the current HEAD as well :-)

Cool.

On the assumption this is going to happen, I've updated the changelog,
and bumped the version number to 2.0-1. I think the file rearrangement
plus new maintainers justify the leap. (Should that be 2.0.0-1?)

So, as far as I know, the NAMESPACE branch is ready
to build and upload, if everyone is happy. If not, let me know
and I'll update the changelog etc in HEAD, and we can go with that
instead.

This release will close *every* outstanding surfraw bug in the BTS!
I've put the appropriate (Closes: ) lines in the changelog.
(What about the NMU stuff, does that need to be acknowledged
by the maintainer?)

thanks for your input,

Ian.